Parallel lines on a graph are a good indicator of an interaction.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Re-stateing the prompt helps anchor the discussion: the question asks whether parallel lines on a graph are a good indicator of an interaction.
Option 1: True. This would claim that parallel lines signal an interaction. In many analytical contexts, especially in factorial designs, parallel lines actually suggest that there is no interaction between factors, because the effect of one factor remains consistent across levels of the other factor. Therefore, this statement mischaracterizes what parallelism usually means in interaction analysis.
Option 2: False. This option asserts that parallel lines do not indicate an interaction, which aligns with standard interpretation: non-parallel lines, or lines that diverge or converge, are the hallmark of an interaction between factors, because the effect of one factor depends on the level of the other. Parallelism implies the effect of one factor is consistent across levels of the other, signaling no interaction.
To unpack potential confusion: if the graph is of mean responses across two factors, identical slopes (parallel lines) indicate additive effects without interaction, whereas a crossing or twisting pattern indicates that the factors interact in influencing the outcome. Recognizing this distinction is crucial for correct interpretation of interaction effects in factorial designs.
In summary, if the goal is to identify interactions, looking for non-parallel lines is the correct approach, not parallel lines. Consequently, the claim in Option 1 is incorrect, while Option 2 correctly describes the interpretation.

Parallel lines on a graph are a good indicator of an interaction.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What are all the interactions?

TRUE OR FALSE: Chang and Lauderdale statistically interact poverty income ratio with survey year in order to test whether relationships between income and cholesterol levels change over time.

In a study with variables X and Y, is it possible that X has no main effect, Y has no main effect, yet the interaction of X and Y is significant?

An interaction term in a multiple regression model may be used when

Based on the output of summary() for the model from the previous question, interpret the interaction between nox and dis in the context of predicting medv. Choose the correct interpretation:

Based on the output of the summary() for the model from Question 1, is there evidence of an association between nox and medv? Choose the correct interpretation.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单