Question 1: Lee (2014) argued that the government should provide recognition to other programs, such as an organization overseeing these programs.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To begin, let's unpack what each option claims in relation to Lee (2014)'s idea about government recognition of other programs.
Option A: Integral citation. This choice suggests that recognition should be given through an integral form of citation, i.e., citing other programs as an essential, integrated part of the overarching framework. This aligns with the notion of giving formal acknowledgment or credit within the structure of the program itself, treating external programs as core components rather than as tangential references. In educational and policy contexts, integral recognition often means embedding acknowledgment directly into governance or reporting, which fits the idea of the government acknowledging and integrating oversight with other programs.
Option B: Non-integral citation. This option would imply recognition is given in a manner that is separate or peripheral, perhaps as a footnote, appendix, or a detached acknowledgment that does not affect the main architecture of the program. If the government’s stance is to recognize other programs but keep them outside the central framework, this non-integral approach would be the mechanism. However, such an approach tends to be less about structural integration and more about optional or marginal acknowledgment.
Now, evaluating the statements critically:
- If the goal is for the government to provide recognition to other programs in a way that makes those programs part of the official framework and coordination, an integral form of citation makes more sense conceptually. It signals that the recognition is not merely ornamental but embedded in governance, accountability, and oversight mechanisms. This reduces fragmentation and reinforces coordinated oversight across programs.
- The non-integral approach would leave the recognition as a peripheral gesture, which could lead to inconsistent coordination, weaker governance links, and the perception that the recognition is ceremonial rather than functional.
- In terms of potential misconceptions, one might think both forms are equally valid recognitions. Yet the rhetoric of “providing recognition to other programs” typically implies a deeper integration rather than a casual acknowledgment, which supports the integral framing.
- A potential pitfall in selecting the non-integral option would be overlooking the importance of coherence and alignment among programs, which integral recognition helps to ensure by embedding acknowledgment within the main governance structure.
- As a result, the justification for option A being the intended answer rests on the interpretation that recognition should be embedded (integral) rather than kept separate (non-integral).
In summary, option A presents a more cohesive view of recognition as part of the central governance approach, whereas option B describes a more detached and less integrated form of acknowledgment. The reasoning above highlights why the integral form aligns with a coordinated oversight perspective and why the non-integral form would be less effective for unified governance.

Question 1: Lee (2014) argued that the government should provide recognition to other programs, such as an organization overseeing these programs.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following sentences uses a non-integral in-text citation?

Which of the following parenthetical in-text citations is correct?

You are citing the work of an author named John F. Kennedy. Along with the year of publication, what part(s) of his name are you most likely to put in a parenthetical in-text citation?

Question 2: The government should provide recognition to other programs, such as an organization overseeing these programs (Lee, 2014).

5. Which citation in the example below is correct?

4. Which citation in the example below is correct?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单