Based on the film watched in class, many groundbreaking researchers were killed from exposure to radiation.

Question

Based on the film watched in class, many groundbreaking researchers were killed from exposure to radiation.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks whether, based on the film watched in class, many groundbreaking researchers were killed from exposure to radiation.
Option a) a) True
Option b) b) False

Option a) True: This claim would require that a large number of influential scientists were killed specifically due to radiation exposure. While history includes notable cases of radiation-related deaths (for example, early radiologists or physicists who suffered from long-term exposure, and a few famous incidents involving acute radiation syndrome), these examples are relatively limited in number compared to the entire group of researchers in radiation science. Therefore, saying “many” would likely overstate the risk or frequency. A careful read would distinguish between a few high-profile fatalities and a broader trend of danger, emphasizing that safety protocols, shielding, and regulation reduced fatalities over time. If the film emphasizes dramatic fatalities or singular sensational stories, this option might still misrepresent the overall pattern by using a qualitative exaggeration.

Option b) False: This choice challenges the absolute or sweeping claim implied by “many researchers were killed.” It acknowledges that radiation exposure caused deaths among some researchers, but argues that the total number is not large enough to describe it as “many.” This interpretation aligns with views that, while dangerous and historically significant, the casualties were relatively limited, especially as safety measures improved. It also invites attention to nuance: what counts as a “groundbreaking researcher,” what time period the film covers, and whether the film presents a broader context of risk versus safety improvements.

Option a) True (alternative reasoning): If the film portrayed radiation work as inherently lethal to a substantial portion of researchers, this could be a mischaracterization, because not all pioneers in radiation science died from exposure, and many continued to contribute despite risks. The claim would require verifying the number of fatalities among a specific cohort, which is unlikely to be as high as “many” across all groundbreaking researchers. This option would be accepted only if the film explicitly documents a large, representative casualty count.

Option b) False (alternative reasoning): From a nuance perspective, even if some researchers died from radiation exposure, the label “many” would still be contested. The film might also discuss how discoveries came with risk, yet the broader historical record includes numerous researchers who advanced the field without fatal consequences, and improved safety protocols drastically reduced later fatalities.

In summary, the reasoning supports that the statement overgeneralizes the risk; the safer interpretive stance is that while radiation exposure did cause deaths among a subset of researchers, describing it as affecting “many” groundbreaking researchers is misleading. The more precise stance is that such fatalities occurred but were not widespread across all pivotal figures in radiation science.

Based on the film watched in class, many groundbreaking researchers were killed from exposure to radiation.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Before the sciences was considered a legitimate course of study in universities, they were considered what?

Who first introduced Charles Darwin and evolution by natural selection to the Chinese?

Maienschein claims that studying the history of science can improve science's efficiency. What does she mean by this? (Check BOTH that apply)

Which of the following are arguments Maienschein discusses in favor of studying the history of science? (Check BOTH that apply)

In this week's lecture, we discussed a famous US-American scientist. His goal was to create a mathematical proof for the existence of retrogression within his scientific domain. True or False?

Question at position 7 TrueFalse

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单