Baluran and Patterson explain some of their findings by the fact that recent immigrants generally have a health advantage (compared to native-born individuals).

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a statement related to Baluran and Patterson, asserting that recent immigrants generally have a health advantage compared to native-born individuals.
First, note that the provided data for this item includes an answer of True but provides no list of answer options to evaluate besides that single truth value. In a typical multiple-choice setup, we would compare all given choices to determine correctness; here, we must work with the statement itself and the context given.
Turning to the substance, the claim reflects a well-documented phenomenon in public health known as the healthy immigrant effect: newcomers often show better health metrics upon arrival than the native-born population, with some studies showing health advantages that may diminish over time as acculturation and exposure to other risk factors occur. This supports the plausibility of the statement being true in many contexts, especially when considering immigrant health advantage as a general concept rather than a universal rule for every immigrant group or health outcome.
However, several caveats are essential to avoid overgeneralization. First, the healthy immigrant effect is not universal across all health indicators or all immigrant groups; some populations may experience immediate or early health disadvantages due to pre-migration conditions, selection effects, or barriers to access. Second, the effect can wane with length of residence in the host country, due to acculturation, changes in lifestyle, or cumulative exposure to lifestyle-related risks. Third, health outcomes can be influenced by surveillance access, socioeconomic status, discrimination, and policy environments, which means findings can vary across countries and time periods.
With these nuances in mind, evaluating the statement on its face as true aligns with the general conceptual understanding of the healthy immigrant effect, while recognizing that exceptions and complexities exist depending on context, population, and outcome measured.
If we were to critique the lack of explicit answer options, we could note that without competing statements to contrast, the assessment relies on your knowledge of whether the described finding is commonly observed in immigration health research rather than on process of elimination among listed choices.
In summary, the claim that recent immigrants generally have a health advantage compared to native-born individuals reflects a recognized pattern in health research, though it is contingent on factors like duration of residence, type of health outcome, and population studied, and must be interpreted with these caveats in mind.

202520 SOC 4357 F1 Unit Four Quiz

Baluran and Patterson explain some of their findings by the fact that recent immigrants generally have a health advantage (compared to native-born individuals).

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单