Read the sentence below. Decide whether it has a mistake in the citation, in the grammar or whether it is correct. If there is an error, think about how to correct it. According to Mathews (2007, p. 432), claims that there is never any justification for the streaming of pupils in primary education.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The task presents a sentence and asks to decide whether there is a mistake in the citation, grammar, or if it is correct. Here, the likely issue is grammar rather than citation formatting.

Consider the sentence fragment: 'According to Mathews (2007, p. 432), claims that there is never any justification for the streaming of pupils in primary education.'

- Why this looks like a grammar problem: After the introductory phrase 'According to Mathews (2007, p. 432),' the sentence should continue with a main clause that has a clear subject and predicate. Instead, we encounter 'claims that there is never any justification...,' which appears to be a noun phrase or a dependent fragment lacking a main verb to attach to the introductory element. In standard grammar, you would either supply a subject for the verb or rephrase to form a complete sentence.

- Possible corrections to fix the grammar:
  1) 'According to Mathews (2007, p. 432), there are claims that there is never any justification for the streaming of pupils in primary education.' — adds a dummy subject 'there are' to create a complete independent clause.
  2) 'According to Mathews (2007, p. 432), the claim is that there is never any justification for the streaming of pupils in primary education.' — turns 'claims' into a definite subject with proper article and verb.
  3) 'According to Mathews (2007, p. 432), claims that there is never any justification for the streaming of pupils in primary education were made.' — if you intend to report claims in the past, you adjust the tense and add a auxiliary verb to form a full clause.

- Why a citation issue is less likely here: The citation 'Mathews (2007, p. 432)' is formatted in a typical author-date style. The problem seems not to be incorrect citation formatting (no obvious errors like missing parentheses, year, or page detail) but rather the sentence structure that leaves a fragment after the introductory phrase.

- Misconceptions to avoid:
  - Assuming the error is only about punctuation like a comma after the citation: while punctuation could be adjusted, the more fundamental problem is that the remainder of the sentence does not form a complete thought without rearrangement.
  - Believing the sentence is correct as written ignores the need for a main clause that carries the verb and a subject after the introductory citation.

- Summary of analysis: The sentence contains a grammatical disruption because the portion following the introductory citation lacks a main clause. Rewriting to include a proper subject-verb construction (e.g., 'there are claims...' or 'the claim is...') would fix the grammar. The citation itself appears acceptable and not the source of the error within the given sentence structure.

FNDN Academic English 2024 STD E3

Read the sentence below. Decide whether it has a mistake in the citation, in the grammar or whether it is correct. If there is an error, think about how to correct it. According to Mathews (2007, p. 432), claims that there is never any justification for the streaming of pupils in primary education.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following is FALSE about grammar?

The writing selected-response questions may ask you to correct the grammar of a sentence.

位置153的问题 My instructor always forgets to bring his papers to class. CorrectIncorrect

This is a writing course, so we'll be covering a lot of grammar rules.

Select one answer to complete the sentence with correct grammar. A new lecturer has been preparing for next semester.

What are prescriptive and descriptive grammar rules?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单