Question51 Government deficit. If international investors begin to doubt the ability for a country to finance spending with ________, markets will demand ________. taxes and borrowing; lower interest rates taxes and borrowing; higher interest rates borrowing; more bonds borrowing; less government spending only taxes; higher interest rates ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question: Government deficit. If international investors begin to doubt the ability for a country to finance spending with ________, markets will demand ________.
Options:
1) taxes and borrowing; lower interest rates
2) taxes and borrowing; higher interest rates
3) borrowing; more bonds
4) borrowing; less government spending
5) only taxes; higher interest rates

Option 1 analysis: Saying that financing with taxes and borrowing would lead to lower interest rates is inconsistent with standard financing dynamics. If investors doubt a country’s ability to finance through taxes and borrowing, they would typically demand higher, not lower, yields to compensate for risk. Therefore this choice misstates the consequence of doubt and misattributes the direction of interest-rate movement.

Option 2 analysis (the correct-looking pairing): The idea is that if investors doubt the country can finance spending via taxes and borrowing, they would require higher compensation for risk, i.e., higher interest rates. This aligns with the core mechanism: increased perceived risk raises required returns, pushing up yields on borrowing. Note the phrasing connects the financing method (taxes and borrowing) with the market’s reaction (higher interest rates).

Option 3 analysis: 'borrowing; more bonds' suggests that doubt would lead to more issuance of bonds, and that markets would react with higher demand for bonds or higher prices. In reality, doubt about financing would more plausibly raise yields, not simply increase the number of bonds issued. The linkage to 'more bonds' does not directly capture the standard market response described in the prompt.

Option 4 analysis: 'borrowing; less government spending' would imply a policy tightening that reduces deficit, but the statement about investors doubting financing does not logically imply that the response is to reduce government spending. It instead centers on the price of borrowing, i.e., interest rates, so this pairing misses the market’s typical reaction to financing doubt.

Option 5 analysis: 'only taxes; higher interest rates' restricts the financing channel to taxes alone, ignoring borrowing as a key tool. In practice, deficits are financed by both taxes and borrowing, so this answer is too narrow and misrepresents the typical mix. The claim that higher interest rates follow from doubt about financing via taxes alone is incomplete and misleading.

Summary of reasoning across options: The scenario describes a loss of confidence in the ability to finance deficit spending through the usual channels (tax revenue and borrowing). Financial markets respond by demanding higher returns to compensate for the increased risk, which translates into higher interest rates on government borrowing. Options that predict lower interest rates, or that misidentify the financing mechanism or the market response, fail to capture this fundamental relationship.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What is national debt?

What is national debt?

What is national debt?

What is a possible negative effect of a big increase in government debt?

What is a possible negative effect of a big increase in government debt?

What is national debt?

How many trillions of dollars has the government borrowed and spent since Covid-19 struck in early 2020.?

Government debt is:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单