Question at position 11 Given the following Haskell expression Which of the following expressions is equivalent to the above, using the $ operator to reduce parentheses? Clear my selection

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the question and the available answer forms to compare them clearly.
Question: Given the Haskell expression result = map (*2) $ filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6], which of the following expressions is equivalent to the above, using the $ operator to reduce parentheses?
Answer options:
- Option A: result = map *2 $ filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6]
- Option B: result = map (*2) $ filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6]
- Option C: result = map $ (*2) (filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6])
- Option D: result = map (*2) (filter >3) [1, 4, 3, 6]

Option A analysis:
This option uses map *2, which is missing the parentheses around *2. In Haskell, (*2) denotes a function that multiplies its argument by 2; without the parentheses, *2 is not a valid function value here, so this expression is syntactically invalid or would not type-check as intended. Moreover, the intended use of $ is to avoid parentheses around the second argument; this form does not correctly place the operator and the function as a single function-application chain.

Option B analysis:
This expression writes result = map (*2) $ filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6]. Here, (*2) is the function to be mapped, and $ is used to apply the map to the result of filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6] without extra parentheses. This matches the structure of the original expression: map (*2) applied to the result of filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6], with the $ making the grouping explicit and eliminating the need for parentheses around the second argument. Logically and syntactically, this is a correct reformulation using ($).

Option C analysis:
In this form, result = map $ (*2) (filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6]). The ($) operator is applied between map and the result of (*2) (filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6]). Because ($) has low precedence, this ends up supplying a single argument to map: the value (*2) (filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6]), which is the result of applying the function (*2) to the list (filter (>3) [1, 4, 3, 6]). This changes the meaning from mapping over the list to multiplying the entire list result by 2, which is not equivalent to the original expression. Hence, incorrect.

Option D analysis:
This expression uses filter >3 without parentheses, which is invalid syntax for the comparison function in the list context. The correct predicate should be (>3) to produce a list of elements greater than 3. As written, this option would not type-check or would be interpreted incorrectly, so it is incorrect.

Summarizing the reasoning across options, Option B is the one that preserves the intended structure, uses the $ operator properly to avoid extra parentheses, and matches the semantics of applying map (*2) to the filtered list.

Question at position 11 Given the following Haskell expression Which of the following expressions is equivalent to the above, using the $ operator to reduce parentheses? Clear my selection

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Question at position 7 Given the following Haskell function: Which one of the following expressions correctly applies increment to a value of type Maybe Int? Clear my selection

Question at position 3 A programming language must have static typing to support functional programming.TrueFalse

"You cannot use iteration constructs (for, while, do-while) in a purely functional programming language. (ex: Haskell)" True or False?

Given the following definition of 'sqr' and 'res1' How many times was 'sqr' called to compute 'res1'? Note: 'even' is an inbuilt function which returns true if the argument is an even number

Given the following definition of doubleEvens when you invoke it as follows what is the result?

Given the following definition of computeList When you invoke it as follows What is the result?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单