The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for all individuals and in all cases.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement under consideration is: 'The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for all individuals and in all cases.'

Option 1: True. This option claims that the First Amendment provides absolute, universal freedom of speech in every context. In reality, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech from government restriction, but it does not subject to no limitations. There are well-established exceptions and qualifications, such as time, place, and manner restrictions, speech that incites imminent lawless action, true threats, defamation, obscenity, and certain national security or privacy concerns. Therefore, labeling the protection as unconditional and unlimited is inaccurate.

Option 2: False. This option correctly signals that the guarantee is not absolute. The First Amendment applies to government action and creates a framework through which speech is protected, but courts have recognized numerous exceptions and restrictions in various circumstances. For example, private actors may set their own speech rules, and even government-protected speech can be limited when it intersects with other compelling interests or specific harms. Additionally, certain categories of speech have been restricted (e.g., incitement, true threats, defamation). Hence, this statement captures the nuance that freedom of speech is not granted in all cases without exception.

In sum, the core misconception in the 'True' option is the claim of universality and absolutism, while the 'False' option aligns with constitutional doctrine that protections are robust but not unlimited, and subject to specific legal limits and contexts.

PRT 286 (001& 002) Exam 2

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for all individuals and in all cases.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

According to the lecture, how is the right to free speech often framed?

Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.

The First Amendment protects even speech that violates criminal laws.

Speech counts as “protected” if...

Laws that are designed to suppress the publication of particular viewpoints in the US are reviewed under a judicial standard of:

“Chilling effect” is a term that describes:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单