题目
题目
未知题型

If you know that some law restricts only unprotected speech, what can you conclude based on that fact alone?

选项
A.The law violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
B.In order to be constitutional, the law must advance a substantial governmental interest.
C.The law doesn’t violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
D.If the law’s constitutionality is challenged in court, the law will need to pass either intermediate or strict scrutiny.
查看解析

查看解析

标准答案
Please login to view
思路分析
When analyzing a law that restricts only unprotected speech, the key point is that unprotected speech is not safeguarded by the First Amendment, so restricting it does not violate the First Amendment on its own. Option 1: 'The law violates the free speech clause...' This is incorrect because t......Login to view full explanation

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道考试原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

In the United States, the right to free speech:

In its 2011 Snyder v. Phelps ruling, the Supreme Court held that Westboro Baptist Church protests at military funerals

Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good. 

CASE MATCHING – match the case with the pertinent legal concept or topic. Each concept/topic can only be used once.  1: Edwards v. National Audubon Society 2: Konaté v. Burkina Faso 3: New York Times v. Sullivan 4: Near v. Minnesota 5: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project 6: Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 7: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 8: Texas v. Johnson 9: Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co 10: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们，立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析，让复习快人一步！