Which abstract or abstracts imply that food assistance remains a necessary part of managing food security in Bangladesh?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Which abstract or abstracts imply that food assistance remains a necessary part of managing food security in Bangladesh?

Option A: a. Only Abstract 1
- Without the abstracts’ actual texts, this claim would require Abstract 1 to explicitly state that only its content supports the necessity of food assistance. If Abstract 2 also discusses or implies ongoing food assistance, this option would be incorrect. Since we cannot verify the full content here, this option rests on assuming Abstract 1 alone makes that point.

Option B: b. Both Abstract 1 and Abstract 2
- This option asserts that both abstracts independently imply that food assistance remains necessary. If Abstract 1 does not argue for ongoing food assistance, or Abstract 2 alone does, this option would be inaccurate. The correctness depends on whether both abstracts contain the necessary implication.

Option C: c. Only Abstract 2
- This option claims that only Abstract 2 supports the idea that food assistance remains a necessary part of managing food security, while Abstract 1 does not. If Abstract 2 indeed makes that point and Abstract 1 does not, this would align with the stated answer key. The plausibility rests on Abstract 2 presenting sustained food-assistance needs and Abstract 1 not making that claim.

Analytical notes on reasoning patterns:
- If an option says “Only Abstract X,” the implicit test is whether Abstract X alone carries the necessary implication while the other abstracts do not.
- If an option says “Both Abstracts,” the test is whether each abstract independently includes the implication; absence in either would undermine that choice.
- Ambiguities in the abstracts’ wording could lead to misinterpretation: some texts might imply ongoing needs indirectly, while others may describe short-term or diminishing needs.

Overall, given the multiple-choice structure, the evaluated choices hinge on whether the plural or singular attribution to the abstracts accurately reflects their content about ongoing food assistance. The option that assigns the implication exclusively to Abstract 2 would be correct if Abstract 2 contains the explicit claim about continued food-assistance necessity and Abstract 1 does not.

ME Mod4 Intake 2A - 14 Apr 2025 - 4 Jul 2025 Activity 7.4B - Food Security Comprehension Questions

Which abstract or abstracts imply that food assistance remains a necessary part of managing food security in Bangladesh?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

位置183的问题 Russia has a food shortage, and their economy is in trouble. CorrectIncorrect

What percentage of the world’s population are unable to access the Global food economy?世界上有多少百分比的人口无法进入全球食品经济？

What is the common theme in the two abstracts?

Question textQuestions 11 to 14: Complete the following lecture outline using ONE WORD from the lecture. (11) Answer 1 Question 1[input] (12) Answer 2 Question 1[input] (13) Answer 3 Question 1[input] (14) Answer 4 Question 1[input]

How to enhance food security?

Which abstract or abstracts imply that food assistance remains a necessary part of managing food security in Bangladesh?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单