You are given the principle stresses MPa, MPa and MPa. If the material has an ultimate strength of MPa, determine the safety factor according to the Rankine criterion.

Select one alternative:

Question

You are given the principle stresses  MPa,  MPa and  MPa. If the material has an ultimate strength of  MPa, determine the safety factor according to the Rankine criterion.

Select one alternative:

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents principal stresses given in MPa and an ultimate strength also in MPa, and asks for the safety factor according to the Rankine criterion, with a single choice option provided as 1.83.

First, restating the core concept: Rankine (all or nothing) criterion says failure occurs when the maximum principal stress in a member reaches the material's ultimate tensile strength. The corresponding safety factor is typically calculated as SF = (ultimate tensile strength) / (maximum principal stress).

Now, examine the provided data for each option:
- The problem statement lists three principal stresses as MPa, MPa, and MPa, but the actual numeric values are missing from the text. Without concrete numbers, we cannot identify which principal stress is the maximum, nor can we compare it to the given ultimate strength. In other words, the calculation depends on numeric inputs that are not present here.

- The ultimate strength value is also indicated as MPa in the prompt, but the numeric value is not displayed. Without the UTS number, the ratio SF = UTS / max_s cannot be computed.

- The answer options field is empty in the data you provided, so there is no alternative to compare against the given option 1.83, nor to verify whether that value would result from the calculation if numbers were present.

To understand the method more concretely, suppose we had the values; the steps would be:
1) Identify the maximum absolute principal stress among the three given values. 
2) Compute SF = (UTS) / (max principal stress). 
3) Compare the calculated SF to any provided options to select the correct one. If SF > 1, the design is safe under Rankine; if SF ≤ 1, it's unsafe.

In summary, a definitive calculation cannot be performed with the data as shown because the numerical principal stresses and the ultimate strength are not provided. If you supply the numeric values for the three principal stresses and the ultimate tensile strength, I can compute the Rankine safety factor and verify whether 1.83 is the correct result.

INU1127 (24/25) Semester 2 Assessment (Mock 1)

You are given the principle stresses MPa, MPa and MPa. If the material has an ultimate strength of MPa, determine the safety factor according to the Rankine criterion. Select one alternative:

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单