题目
题目

23115 Economics for Business - Autumn 2025 Microeconomics News Analysis

多重下拉选择题

Bulk Billing Bulk billing Links to an external site. is a payment option under the Medicare system. It can cover a prescribed range of health services.  Under the system, patients don’t have to pay for the medical service from a health professional, usually a General Practitioner (GP). Instead, the GP bills the government and accept the Medicare benefit as full payment for the service. Not all health professionals bulk bill and the rate of professional doing so has decreased over time. The two Australian major parties, Labor and the Coalition, have pledged to raise GP bulk billing Links to an external site. . (*) Let's try to model the market for GP visits using the perfect competition framework of demand and supply. In the figures below, the horizontal axis represents the quantity of GP visits, while the vertical axis represents price, along with the corresponding demand and supply curves. While this model may not be the most suitable for analyzing healthcare markets, assume for now that its core assumptions hold. One justification for government intervention in the healthcare market is the presence of externalities. In this model, the externality would take the form of a positive externality in consumption . In that case, the top-right plot in Figure 1 would be the most appropriate to justify a government subsidy. For the following questions, please refer to the Figure 2. The meaning of the dashed lines is the same as in the earlier figure, where you were asked to pick the most appropriate type of externality. According to the model, and given your answer to the earlier question, the socially optimal quantity of GP visits is Qc whereas in the absence of any government intervention the equilibrium market quantity is Qb . To achieve the socially optimal quantity the government can provide a [ Select ] tax subsidy none of the options equal to [ Select ] Pa Pb Pc none of the options such that the price received by GPs would be [ Select ] Pa Pb Pc none of the options , and the price paid by patients would be [ Select ] Pa Pb Pc none of the options . The model suggests that for GP visits to be free at the point of use, as in bulk-billing, the unit subsidy should be [ Select ] as large as larger than smaller than the subsidy needed to achieve the socially optimal quantity. It is important to note that the criterion for achieving the socially optimal allocation is based [ Select ] only on efficiency only on equity on both efficiency and equity . Now, let's briefly assess whether the perfect competition model of demand and supply is appropriate for this context. The key assumptions of the model are [ Select ] only one seller and many buyers a handful of sellers and many buyers many sellers and many buyers and [ Select ] differentiated products across sellers identical products across sellers . In the GP market, [ Select ] only the first assumption is only the second assumption is both assumptions are very reasonable, which may explain why, according to the articles, GPs charge a different price.

题目图片
查看解析

查看解析

标准答案
Please login to view
思路分析
This question presents a scenario using a perfect competition framework to model GP visits with externalities and asks you to fill in several blanks. I will walk through each selected option in order, explaining what it would imply and whether it aligns with the typical analysis of such a diagrammatic problem. - positive: In the context of externalities in consumption, a positive externality means that individuals gain additional benefits from consuming GP visits that are not captured by the market price. That makes sense here if we think about broader public health benefits from more accessible primary care. Using a positive externality is appropriate when discussing why government intervention might be justified. However, you must also ensure this aligns with the specific label used in the figure and prompt for the externality discussion; if the figure labels the externality as positive in consumption, this would be correct. - consumption: The externality in question is typically categorized as an externality in consumption rather than production, since the beneficial spillovers from a patient receiving care affect others in the economy (e.g., through better public health). So identifying it as a positive externality in consumption is consistent with the standard interpretation. If the question’s text distinguishes between externalities in consumption versus production, this option should reflect that distinction correctly. - top-right: In many diagrammatic questions ab......Login to view full explanation

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道考试原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

The above diagram shows the private and social marginal costs (PMC and SMC) associated with the production of a fossil fuel energy (such as natural gas, oil, or coal). The demand curve shows the private marginal benefit (PMB) curve for users of fossil-fuel based energy (FFE). There are no demand side externalities so the Demand curve is both the PMB and the SMB curve. The government provides a subsidy to fossil-fuel makers of $s per unit. There are no other policies in place. The [ Select ] vertical horizontal distance between the PMC and SMC curves corresponds to the [ Select ] abatement negative externality positive externality imposed by each unit of fossil-fuel energy (FFE) production. The socially optimal quantity of FFE is  [ Select ] Q3 Q1 Q2 The deadweight-loss from the FFE subsidy is  [ Select ] R+F+H D+E F+H O+P The deadweight-loss from no intervention (competitive equilibrium under laissez faire) [ Select ] D+E+I+N+O+P R R+F+H D The price the consumer pays net of the subsidy is    [ Select ] P3-s P3 greater than P2 The price that firms receive per unit they produce (in the presence of the subsidy)  is [ Select ] less than P3 greater than P2 P2 P1 If the government eliminated the subsidy and replaced it with the socially optimal tax on each unit of FFE, then [ Select ] the new deadweight loss would be area R consumer surplus would fall by the amount shown in area L the price consumers pay (including the tax) would rise to P1 the new deadweight loss would be area D+E Self-interest predicts that a producer economic interest group would lobby for  [ Select ] the optimal tax laissez faire (no intervention) the subsidy s Friedman's theory of Corporate Social Responsibility implies that, when the government provides the subsidy, [ Select ] it is socially responsible for firms to lobby for the optimal tax it is socially responsible for firms to produce output Q2 it is socially responsible for firms to produce Q3 under the subsidy

If a positive externality exists in the consumption of a good, the private market equilibrium quantity will be  

Which is true of a market that has allocational inefficiency (DWL) due to negative externalities? The competitive equilibrium output of that good is lower than the social optimum. [ Select ] The competitive equilibrium output of that good his higher than the social optimum. [ Select ] Social marginal costs at the competitive equilibrium are lower than private marginal costs. [ Select ] Property rights are well defined and transaction costs are low. [ Select ]    

Consider the following statements about externalities and environmental policy, which of the following are true/false? The effect of a carbon tax on prices will be lower when demand is price-ineleastic. False The market distortions from a negative externality could be eliminated by the creation of a market, where tradable permits allocate pollution rights'' that can be priced and traded. [ Select ] The optimal tax is smaller than the negative externality because taxes create deadweight losses. [ Select ] Since abatement creates positive externalities its optimal level is always positive. [ Select ] When taxing negative externalities, the government gets revenues while reducing deadweight losses. [ Select ]

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们,立即解锁 海量真题独家解析,让复习快人一步!