Among basic research methods, an experiment is capable of providing the most convincing evidence of cause-and-effect relationships.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Consider the claim about cause-and-effect evidence in research. 
Option 1: True. This statement reflects the standard view in basic research methods: experiments uniquely enable manipulation of an independent variable and random assignment to conditions, while controlling extraneous variables. Such control allows researchers to infer causality more convincingly than non-experimental designs, where confounds and reverse causation can obscure links. In other designs, like correlational studies, you can observe associations but cannot rule out alternative explanations. 
Option 2: False. This option would be incorrect because, in general, experiments are designed to establish causal relationships by controlling variables and randomizing participants, which strengthens internal validity. While it’s true that practical, ethical, or logistical constraints can limit experimental feasibility, the claim asks about the method’s capability, not about its always-being-used state; under typical conditions, experiments provide the clearest causal evidence among basic research methods. 
In summary, the reasoning supports that experiments are the strongest method for establishing causality in basic research, while acknowledging that non-experimental designs have limitations that prevent definitive causal conclusions in many contexts.

MKTG3401.10290.202610 Exam 1- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Among basic research methods, an experiment is capable of providing the most convincing evidence of cause-and-effect relationships.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following is a synonym for a between-subjects design?

Which of the following is true regarding the difference between a non-experimental design and an experimental design?

A research involved sending out obtaining information from students using a survey If a representative sample has been established, randomly assigning participants to groups rather than using pre-determined selection factors (such as degree type, gender, or age) will increase the internal validity.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单