There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement to evaluate is: 'There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.'
Option 1: True. This would be an unusual stance, because assuming audiences won’t question data ignores the reality that readers often scrutinize sources, methods, and conclusions. It overlooks potential biases, the quality of the evidence, and the rigor of the research, making the claim inconsistent with best practices in critical thinking and scholarly communication.
Option 2: False. This option aligns with the idea that evaluating sources is essential for credibility. It recognizes that audiences may challenge data, check for reliability, examine authorship, publication venue, sample size, methodology, funding sources, and potential conflicts of interest. It also emphasizes that transparent sourcing helps readers assess validity and reproducibility, and that researchers should anticipate questions rather than assume unquestioned acceptance.
Option 1 revisited: If one insisted that evaluation is unnecessary, it risks presenting weak or biased information as credible, which can undermine trust and invite scrutiny. The premise ignores how audiences typically verify claims, especially in academic, professional, or public-facing contexts.
Option 2 revisited: Emphasizing evaluation of sources encourages responsible communication, supports evidence-based conclusions, and prepares the presenter to address critiques with concrete, citable material. It also promotes consistency with standards for citing authority, methodology, and data integrity.

There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Explore the websites in the options below, which ones can you use for your written assessments for FOUND101 and FOUND201 and most of your university papers?

What type of source is this article most likely from?

As a student writing an academic paper, can a wiki such as Wikipedia or Investopedia ever be considered a useful resource?

What is the best reason for why is it important to read multiple sources of news?

How would you establish accuracy for a book? [check all that apply]

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单