Explore the websites in the options below, which ones can you use for your written assessments for FOUND101 and FOUND201 and most of your university papers?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To tackle this question, I’ll evaluate each option in terms of suitability for formal written assessments (FOUND101, FOUND201, and most university papers).
Option a: Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) – https://owl.purdue.edu
This resource is widely used in academia for writing guidance, citation standards (APA, MLA, etc.), and formatting rules. It is appropriate for improving scholarly writing, understanding plagiarism, and mastering citation practices, which makes it a solid choice for assessments.
Option b: Yale University Avalon Project – https://avalon.law.yale.edu
The Avalon Project provides primary source documents in law and history. For university papers that require analysis of historical or legal texts, primary sources are valuable, making Avalon a suitable reference site when appropriate to the assignment.
Option c: European Union – https://europa.eu
The EU site offers official documents, policies, and legal texts. It is a credible source for policy analysis, legal research, or papers on European affairs, public policy, or international relations, thus appropriate for many university assignments.
Option d: Medium (Aggregator sites compile articles from various sources) - https://medium.com/tag/climate-change
Medium aggregates articles from diverse authors with varying levels of credibility. Because of mixed reliability and potential lack of peer review, it’s generally less suitable as a primary source for formal academic papers. It might be used with caution if you verify sources and cite primary material, but by itself it’s not ideal for rigorous assessments.
Option e: World Health Organization (WHO) – https://www.who.int
WHO is a premier source for international health information, guidelines, and data. For topics in health, public health, epidemiology, or global health policy, WHO is highly credible and appropriate for scholarly use.
Option f: BBC News – https://www.bbc.com
BBC News is a reputable news outlet offering current events reporting. While it can be a good starting point for background information, for formal academic papers you’d typically corroborate facts with primary sources or peer‑reviewed literature rather than relying solely on news reporting. It’s acceptable as a supplementary source, but not as the sole basis for rigorous academic analysis.

In summary, options a, b, c, and e represent strong, appropriate sources for written assessments due to their reliability and relevance to scholarly work. Option d is less ideal because aggregator content varies in credibility, and option f, while reputable for current events, is best used as a supplementary context rather than a primary academic source. The reasoning above highlights why each choice aligns or does not align with the goals of university-level writing and assessment standards.

FOUND101-25B (HAM) Unit 1.4 Reading: Developing Critical Approaches

Explore the websites in the options below, which ones can you use for your written assessments for FOUND101 and FOUND201 and most of your university papers?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What type of source is this article most likely from?

As a student writing an academic paper, can a wiki such as Wikipedia or Investopedia ever be considered a useful resource?

What is the best reason for why is it important to read multiple sources of news?

How would you establish accuracy for a book? [check all that apply]

There's no need to evaluate research sources because the audience will never question your data.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单