Using the Entity Relationship Diagram you have drawn on your piece of paper for the Final Subjects Results Table answer the following question.

Which relationship should be drawn between the Results and Lecturers entities for the Final Subjects Results Table?

Question

Using the Entity Relationship Diagram you have drawn  on your piece of paper for the Final Subjects Results Table answer the following question.

Which relationship should be drawn between the Results and Lecturers entities for the Final Subjects Results Table?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Step into the scenario described: the question asks which relationship should be drawn between the Results and Lecturers entities for the Final Subjects Results Table.
Option 1: The first option is blank, which means it provides no content to evaluate. Since it offers no concrete relationship to assess, it cannot be considered a valid choice.
Option 2: The second option is also blank, offering no specific relationship to analyze. Like Option 1, it fails to present a recognizable ERD relationship and therefore is not a usable answer.
Option 3: The third option is again blank, providing no substantive statement about the relationship. Without a concrete relationship description, it cannot guide the ERD design.
Option 4: 'There is no relationship between the Results and Lecturers entities.' If we treat this as the chosen statement, the justification would be that in the Final Subjects Results Table, Lecturer is captured as a data attribute (e.g., a name or email) within the Results record rather than as a foreign key linking to a separate Lecturers entity. In this interpretation, the Results table stores lecturer information itself, and there is no independent relational link (no foreign key) from Results to Lecturers. Therefore, the ERD would not draw a direct relationship between Results and Lecturers because Lecturers is not modeled as a separate related entity for the Results records.
Keep in mind a contrasting view could argue for a relationship if LecturerID served as a foreign key referencing the Lecturers entity; however, since the provided answer specifies that there is no relationship, the reasoning above aligns with treating Lecturer as a non-relational attribute within Results rather than as a linked entity.

Using the Entity Relationship Diagram you have drawn on your piece of paper for the Final Subjects Results Table answer the following question. Which relationship should be drawn between the Results and Lecturers entities for the Final Subjects Results Table?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Use of a supertype/subtype relationship is necessary when which of the following exists?

Which of the following statements is true regarding relationships in an ERD?

Observe the ER diagram for the CENTRAL SCHOOL LIBRARY Which of the following is NOT true according to the Central School Library ER diagram?

ER Modelling A Assuming that common sense applies, which one of the following ER model fragments is most believable?

According to this E/R diagram, which of the following is an entity type? Select one answer.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单