Observe the ER diagram for the BZYX COMPANY:

Which of the following is true according to the BZYX Company ER diagram?

Question

Observe the ER diagram for the BZYX COMPANY:

Which of the following is true according to the BZYX Company ER diagram?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze the ER diagram for BZYX COMPANY, I will examine what each statement implies and whether the diagram supports it.

Option 1: All of the above
This would require that every individual statement is true according to the diagram. Since I cannot confirm that customers can be tracked as not signed up by any employees or that customers can be served by multiple employees from the diagram alone, this broad claim is not safely supported. Therefore, this option is unlikely to be correct.

Option 2: We can keep track of customers that are not signed up by any employees
The relationship labeled SignsUp between EMPLOYEE and CUSTOMER suggests a linking between employees and customers. If SignsUp is optional for some customers (i.e., a customer may exist without a corresponding SIGNSUP record), then it would be possible to have customers not signed up by any employee. However, without explicit notation showing SignsUp as optional on the customer side, we cannot be certain this is always trackable. The diagram’s cardinality would determine this, and based on typical ER notation, this is ambiguous here. So this option may or may not be true depending on the exact cardinality, making it uncertain.

Option 3: We can keep track of customers that are not referred by any customers
The diagram shows a Refers relationship with two roles: ReferredParty and ReferringParty connected to the CUSTOMER entity. This indicates a self-referential referral among customers. If a customer has no incoming referral (i.e., is not referred by any other customer), then we can track such customers as not being referred by any customers. This statement is supported by the diagram, assuming the relationship’s direction/participation allows for zero referrals for some customers.

Option 4: We can keep track of customers that are served by multiple employees
The Serves relationship links EMPLOYEE and CUSTOMER. If Serves is many-to-many, a single customer could be associated with multiple employees. If the diagram’s cardinalities allow multiple employees per customer, this statement would be true; if not (e.g., 1-to-many or 1-to-1 from customer to employees), it would be false. Without explicit cardinality details, this remains uncertain from the image alone.

Option 5: We can keep track of customers that are not served by any employees
Similarly, if Serves is optional for a given customer (i.e., a customer may exist without any Serves relation), then such customers can exist, and we could track them as not served by any employees. But again, the diagram does not make the cardinality explicit enough to confirm this universally. This remains ambiguous.

In summary, the clearest takeaway supported by the diagram is that there is a referral structure among customers (self-referral). The statement about not being referred by any customers (option 3) aligns with the presence of a Refers relationship and the possibility of zero incoming referrals for some customers. The other options depend on cardinalities (which are not explicitly shown in the provided image) and therefore are not definitively guaranteed by the diagram.

MISM3403.16575.202610 Exam 2

Observe the ER diagram for the BZYX COMPANY: Which of the following is true according to the BZYX Company ER diagram?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What does the ERD shown below depict?

The role of cardinality in an ERD is to define the specific attributes of each entity.

An attribute represented with a dashed oval line is a multivalued attribute.

Question at position 7 In an Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD), an entity is represented byA diamondA lineA rectangleAn oval

According to this E/R diagram, which of the following is a derived attribute? Select one answer.

Which of the following is NOT true? Select one answer.

How are attributes documented in an entity-relationship diagram?

What is another name for an entity in an entity-relationship (ER) diagram?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单