Question at position 1 Why is it less feasible for a small local cafeteria to invest in specialized equipment?Due to high costs and low volume of sales Because of the extensive menu optionsBecause they focus on fine diningDue to a lack of customer interest

Question

Question at position 1 Why is it less feasible for a small local cafeteria to invest in specialized equipment?Due to high costs and low volume of sales Because of the extensive menu optionsBecause they focus on fine diningDue to a lack of customer interest

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let us examine each option in turn, using reasoning that ties back to the scenario of a small local cafeteria considering specialized equipment.
Option 1: 'Due to high costs and low volume of sales' — This explanation points to a classic constraint for small operations: the upfront capital required for specialized equipment combined with a relatively small customer base limiting sales volume. The return on investment may be slow, making the investment risky. This reasoning aligns with real-world economics of small-scale food service.
Option 2: 'Because of the extensive menu options' — While a broader menu can increase complexity and costs, it directly suggests that the reason to avoid specialized equipment is the menu breadth itself. In practice, one could still justify equipment investment for efficiency or quality improvements even with a wide menu; this option doesn’t directly address the core feasibility issue of capital and volume, making it less precise.
Option 3: 'Because they focus on fine dining' — Focusing on fine dining could imply higher quality standards and potentially higher staff costs, but it does not inherently explain why specialized equipment is infeasible. In some cases, specialized equipment is precisely used to achieve fine-dining outcomes. As a standalone reason, it’s not a strong justification for infeasibility.
Option 4: 'Due to a lack of customer interest' — A lack of customer interest could reduce demand, but it is a symptom rather than the structural reason related to costs and capacity. Even with limited interest, the fundamental issue for equipment investment remains the cost and expected sales volume, so this option misidentifies the primary constraint.
Overall, the strongest and most directly explanatory option is the first, since it explicitly ties equipment feasibility to the combination of high capital costs and low expected sales volume, which together determine return on investment and risk for a small operation.

Question at position 1 Why is it less feasible for a small local cafeteria to invest in specialized equipment?Due to high costs and low volume of sales Because of the extensive menu optionsBecause they focus on fine diningDue to a lack of customer interest

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

It has been suggested that international firms enjoy greater economies of scale than domestic firms is due to________.

Question at position 45 In the context of Total Cost of Manufacturing (TCM), in general terms, procurement, manufacturing, and transportation per unit costs each go down as volume goes up.TrueFalse

By increasing production volume in an effort to reduce costs, Sematech is pursuing which sources of cost advantage?

By increasing production volume in an effort to reduce costs, Sematech is pursuing which sources of cost advantage?

By increasing production volume in an effort to reduce costs, Sematech is pursuing which sources of cost advantage?

Question at position 9 In the context of Total Cost of Manufacturing (TCM), in general terms, procurement, manufacturing, inventory, warehousing, and transportation per unit costs each go up as volume goes up.TrueFalse

A large-scale entrant is more likely than a small-scale entrant to be able to capture first-mover advantages associated with:

This production strategy is suitable in situations where production processes have high fixed costs. (Select all that apply)

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单