Question at position 41 Why is it important to consider multiple drivers rather than a single explanation when evaluating bee decline evidence?Because multiple drivers often act independently and do not influence one another.Because ecological responses to stressors are complex and involve interacting pressures.Because multiple drivers complicate research and therefore should generally be ignored.Because singular drivers always provide complete explanations for population collapses.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze why considering multiple drivers matters in bee decline evidence, we evaluate each statement on its own terms.
Option 1: 'Because multiple drivers often act independently and do not influence one another.' This claim is misleading because, in ecological systems, drivers often interact and influence each other. For example, pesticide exposure can interact with habitat loss or disease, altering combined effects rather than acting in isolation. Therefore this option undervalues potential interactions between stressors.
Option 2: 'Because ecological responses to stressors are complex and involve interacting pressures.' This statement accurately reflects ecological complexity: bee declines typically result from a suite of interacting factors (pesticides, parasites like Varroa, pathogens, nutrition, climate, habitat, etc.). Recognizing interactions helps avoid attributing decline to a single cause when the reality is multi-causal and potentially synergistic.
Option 3: 'Because multiple drivers complicate research and therefore should generally be ignored.' This is a pessimistic stance that defeats scientific progress. While complexity makes research harder, it does not justify ignoring multiple drivers; rather, it motivates comprehensive study designs and analyses to untangle their effects.
Option 4: 'Because singular drivers always provide complete explanations for population collapses.' This is an overstated and false claim. In most natural systems, single drivers fail to capture the full story, since population collapses usually emerge from interacting factors rather than a single cause.
In summary, the only option that aligns with ecological understanding of bee declines—emphasizing the complexity and interplay of multiple stressors—is option 2, while the others either misrepresent interactions, advocate ignoring complexity, or assume single-cause sufficiency.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Identify the correct statement related to concepts and ideas in ecology:

True or False: Ecological research can be used to support environmental activism.

____________ is a branch of science that studies habitat and the interactions between the biotic and abiotic components.

____________ is a branch of science that studies habitat and the interactions between the biotic and abiotic components.

Match each term to its definition. 1: abiotic factors 2: biotic factors 3: ecosystem 4: ecosystem ecology

Which of the following is the BEST definition of ecology:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单