How do taxes and flotation costs factors affect dividend policy?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question context: This problem asks how taxes and flotation costs influence a company's dividend policy, i.e., whether and how much of earnings should be paid out as dividends.
Option 1: 'They eliminate dividend payments entirely.' This is too extreme. In most real-world settings, taxes and flotation costs make paying large, frequent dividends less attractive, but they do not universally force a complete elimination of dividends. Firms typically still pay dividends or at least initiate a policy for some level of payout, even if reduced.
Option 2: 'They lead to a preference for low dividends.' This aligns with the standard corporate finance intuition. Higher taxes on dividends reduce after-tax cash to shareholders, and flotation costs raise the cost of issuing new equity, making external funding more expensive. As a result, firms may retain more earnings to finance operations and investments, leading to a preference for lower dividends or more cautious payout policies.
Option 3: 'They have no measurable impact.' This is incorrect in normal capital budgeting and dividend theory. Taxes on dividends and flotation costs are well-documented frictions that influence payout decisions; ignoring them overlooks a key channel through which finance theory explains dividend policy.
Option 4: 'They encourage higher dividend payouts.' This contradicts the core effect of higher taxes on dividends and higher flotation costs. If anything, these frictions suppress the attractiveness of large dividend payouts, not encourage them, since paying out dividends reduces funds that could be retained to avoid these costs.
Additional nuance: The impact of taxes and flotation costs can depend on investor clientele, tax treatment, and market conditions, but the general takeaway is that these factors incentivize retaining earnings or seeking lower payout policies rather than expanding dividends. The reasoning also recognizes that some firms may still pay dividends for signaling or market expectations, but the question focuses on the typical costly-frictions effect, which points to lower dividends.
In summary, evaluating all options against standard theory shows that the presence of taxes on dividends and flotation costs tends to reduce the attractiveness of high dividend payments and pushes firms toward lower dividends or retention, rather than complete elimination, no impact, or higher payouts.

How do taxes and flotation costs factors affect dividend policy?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

CANADIAN TIRE- Part 7 of 11 A young investor who prioritizes long-term growth over income is selecting stocks for her portfolio. She is comfortable with volatility and wants companies that reinvest aggressively in itself. If Walmart Dividend Payout Ratio is 5%, then investors would choose:

Regarding payout policy, select the correct statement:

Regarding payout policy, select the correct statement:

If a firm has a positive NPV project but cannot raise equity or capital to do it, then it can obtain the funds by temporarily cutting its regular dividends and this will generally have little or no impact on its stock price.

Which of the following statements concerning payout policy is incorrect?

According to the clientele effect, can a firm boost its share price by raising dividends?

Which of the following statements is FALSE?[Fill in the blank]

Which of the following statements is FALSE?[Fill in the blank]

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单