题目
hk_302_120251_246592 3.3 | Learning Check
单项选择题
The ruling from Olmstead v. L.C. court case stipulated that:
选项
A.Children with disabilities should receive free and appropriate public education.
B.It is considered discrimination to segregate people with disabilities into nursing homes or other institutional settings against their will.
C.Courtrooms need to be made accessible for individuals with disabilities.
D.Children with disabilities are required to have appropriate assistive technology to support their educational endeavors.
查看解析
标准答案
Please login to view
思路分析
The question asks about the ruling from the Olmstead v. L.C. court case and what it stipulated.
Option A: 'Children with disabilities should receive free and appropriate public education.' This statement aligns with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) principles, not Olmstead. It describes e......Login to view full explanation登录即可查看完整答案
我们收录了全球超50000道考试原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。
类似问题
True or false: After implementation, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was strongly enforced and resulted in significant changes in the day to day lives of individuals with disabilities.
In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things
Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products
People born without creativity never can develop it
更多留学生实用工具
希望你的学习变得更简单
加入我们,立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析,让复习快人一步!