What is the drawback of deposit insurance facility?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, let's restate the question and options to ensure clarity about what's being evaluated.
Question: What is the drawback of deposit insurance facility?
Options:
A. Deposit insurance does not deter contagious runs and panics.
B. DIs are more likely to increase the liquidity risk on their balance sheets.
C. Deposit holder's place in line affects his or her ability to obtain their funds.
D. Even when the DI is in trouble, the deposit holder has no incentive to run.
E. Deposit holders are less likely to panic if there is a perceived bank solvency problem.

Now, evaluate each option carefully:
Option A: Deposit insurance does not deter contagious runs and panics.
- Analysis: This statement captures a known drawback of some deposit insurance schemes: even with guarantees, concern about systemic risk can lead to contagious runs. Critics argue that deposit insurance may not fully prevent panic if the perceived bank solvency problems are widespread, since confidence can be eroded across the system. This option aligns with the idea that insurance is not a foolproof shield against runs in a crisis, which is a legitimate drawback.

Option B: DIs are more likely to increase the liquidity risk on their balance sheets.
- Analysis: Deposit insurance (DI) schemes are typically funded to insure deposits up to a limit and backstopped by the government or a fund. The presence of deposit insurance generally provides liquidity to the banking system by preventing runs, not by increasing liquidity risk on banks’ own balance sheets. If anything, DI reduces the risk of sudden withdrawals, though it may create moral hazard where banks take on more risk, but the statement specifically about increasing liquidity risk on balance sheets is not a standard or direct drawback attributed to DI itself.

Option C: Deposit holder's place in line affects his or her ability to obtain their funds.
- Analysis: In practice, deposit insurance aims to guarantee payment up to a limit without regard to the depositor’s position in a queue. The general design is to ensure all insured depositors are paid up to the insured amount, independent of sequence. This option describes a procedural or operational concern that DI should not cause, and thus is not a typical drawback of deposit insurance.

Option D: Even when the DI is in trouble, the deposit holder has no incentive to run.
- Analysis: This statement is questionable as a drawback since it asserts no incentive to run even when the DI faces trouble. In many frameworks, guarantee schemes can still trigger runs if the guarantee is uncertain or the program is perceived as unstable. However, the wording contradicts common concerns about moral hazard and runs under stress, and it’s not a straightforward drawback associated with DI design. It could be seen as an overly optimistic claim rather than a clear, recognized drawback.

Option E: Deposit holders are less likely to panic if there is a perceived bank solvency problem.
- Analysis: This option describes a potential effect of deposit insurance (reducing panic), which is the opposite of a drawback. A drawback would be something that increases or fails to prevent panic, not something that lessens it. Therefore, this option is not describing a drawback.

In summary, option A presents a plausible drawback of deposit insurance in failing to completely prevent contagious runs and panics, whereas options B, C, D, and E either misrepresent the typical effects of DI, describe non-drawbacks, or state effects that oppose the idea of a drawback. The reasoning distinguishes between how DI is intended to function (stabilize withdrawals and confidence) and the real-world limitations (systemic panic could still occur).

FINS5530-Financial Institution Mgmt - T3 2025

What is the drawback of deposit insurance facility?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Risk-based deposit insurance premiums help control moral hazard by:

Which of the following outcomes is most directly attributable to the absence of a fully mutualised European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS)?

A key reason full European Deposit Insurance Scheme has faced political resistance is that:

A key reason full European Deposit Insurance Scheme has faced political resistance is that:

Part 1Consider a failing bank. If the FDIC uses the payoff method LOADING... , a deposit of $320,000320,000 is worth a minimum of $[input]enter your response here . (Round your response to the nearest whole number.)

Financial consolidation of banks with other financial services in recent years poses government safety net problems. The safety net intended for depository institutions may be

The primary difference between the "payoff" and the "purchase and assumption" methods of handling failed banks is

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单

FINS5530-Financial Institution Mgmt - T3 2025

What is the drawback of deposit insurance facility?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Risk-based deposit insurance premiums help control moral hazard by:

Which of the following outcomes is most directly attributable to the absence of a fully mutualised European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS)?

A key reason full European Deposit Insurance Scheme has faced political resistance is that:

A key reason full European Deposit Insurance Scheme has faced political resistance is that:

Part 1Consider a failing bank. If the FDIC uses the payoff method LOADING... ​, a deposit of ​$320,000320,000 is worth a minimum of ​$[input]enter your response here . ​(Round your response to the nearest whole​ number.)

Financial consolidation of banks with other financial services in recent years poses government safety net problems. The safety net intended for depository institutions may be

The primary difference between the "payoff" and the "purchase and assumption" methods of handling failed banks is

更多留学生实用工具

希望你的学习变得更简单

Part 1Consider a failing bank. If the FDIC uses the payoff method LOADING... , a deposit of $320,000320,000 is worth a minimum of $[input]enter your response here . (Round your response to the nearest whole number.)