Jordan discovers that his company is using a loophole to pay less tax, which is legal but could be considered unethical by some. The extra funds saved are used for employee benefits and charity donations. The public is unaware of these tax practices. From a deontological perspective, what should Jordan’s primary concern be?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks, from a deontological perspective, what should Jordan’s primary concern be when discovering a legal but potentially unethical tax practice.

Option provided: a) The legality of the tax practices and adherence to laws.

First, consider the core idea of deontological ethics: actions are judged by whether they conform to duties, rules, and moral principles, regardless of the outcomes. A deontologist would ask: does the action align with universalizable duties such as honesty, fairness, and paying one’s fair share? Would endorsing or benefiting from a loophole that reduces taxes while remaining legally compliant violate a moral duty to act justly or to avoid taking advantage of loopholes that undermine social obligations?

Next, weigh the emphasis on rules versus consequences. In deontology, following the law is not automatically sufficient if the action violates moral duties. An act can be legal yet morally questionable if it exploits a system in a way that contravenes duties of fairness or honesty. Therefore, focusing solely on legality may miss a crucial deontological assessment of whether the practice respects unified moral duties.

Then, analyze the specifics of the scenario: the loophole is legal but could be deemed unethical by some; funds saved are used for employee benefits and charity donations. From a deontological lens, the primary concern would be whether using the loophole honors or violates duties (e.g., duties to be honest, not to deceive, to contribute to societal welfare). Even if proceeds go toward good ends, if the action itself relies on exploiting a legal loophole in a way that undermines fairness or the spirit of the tax system, a deontologist might view that as problematic.

Now, addressing why this option may be considered correct or insufficient on its own: if the question insists that the primary concern is legality and law adherence, it reflects a legalistic interpretation rather than a pure deontological one. Deontology would push to examine whether the action aligns with moral duties and universalizable principles, not merely whether it is permitted by law. Hence, while legality is relevant, the deontological focus often centers on whether the action respects moral obligations beyond mere compliance with the letter of the law.

In sum, the reasoning in this option centers on legality, which may be criticized from a deontological viewpoint for potentially overlooking fundamental duties and universal moral principles. A more complete deontological answer would articulate duties such as honesty, fairness, and the obligation to uphold the integrity of social institutions, and would assess whether exploiting the loophole aligns with those duties, regardless of legality.

Note: Since no other answer options are provided to compare, this analysis focuses on evaluating the presented option within a deontological framework and clarifies why legality alone may be insufficient as the primary deontological concern.

Ethics Modules

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单