Decision trees are useful for sequential decision-making under demand uncertainty.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The statement to evaluate is 'Decision trees are useful for sequential decision-making under demand uncertainty.' Options: True or False.
Option 1: True. Consider how decision trees operate: they map decisions over time with branches representing possible outcomes (stochastic/demand scenarios). In sequential decision problems, you make an initial decision, observe how demand or other uncertainties unfold, then make subsequent decisions. This structure aligns naturally with the idea of stages and chance events, allowing you to compare expected values across different branching paths. The presence of demand uncertainty is precisely the kind of uncertain information that decision trees can organize: you incorporate probabilities for demand levels, anticipate later decisions, and compute expected utilities or costs by working backward from the end nodes. However, there are caveats: the tractability of a decision tree diminishes as the number of decisions and possible demand states grows (exponential growth of branches), and you may need to discretize continuous demand to keep the tree manageable. Still, conceptually, decision trees are a classic tool for modeling sequential choices under uncertainty, including demand risk, because they explicitly capture timing, information structure, and the consequences of different actions under varying demand realizations.
Option 2: False. If one argued that decision trees are never appropriate for sequential decision-making under demand uncertainty, this would ignore standard applications where stage-wise decisions and stochastic outcomes are explicitly represented. While it is true that for complex or highly dynamic problems other frameworks (such as dynamic programming, Markov decision processes, or stochastic programming) may be more scalable or exact, this does not in itself render decision trees unsuitable. The false claim would involve overly broad generalization, suggesting decision trees cannot model uncertainty or sequential decisions, which conflicts with their fundamental design.
Option 1 reconsidered: A nuanced view recognizes the strengths of decision trees in illustrating how decisions unfold in stages and how uncertainty in demand affects later choices. They provide an intuitive visual and computational framework for comparing alternatives and computing expected outcomes, even if practical limitations require pruning or discretization. The limitation point also explains why one might turn to other methods for very large or continuous-state problems, but that does not invalidate the core applicability to sequential decision problems under uncertainty.
Option 2 reconsidered: The assertion that decision trees are categorically unsuitable for sequential decision-making under demand uncertainty fails to acknowledge the core purpose of decision trees and their common use in operations research and management science. They are capable of representing sequential structure and probabilistic outcomes, which is central to managing demand risk. The impracticalities are methodological rather than conceptual disproof of usefulness.
In summary, the correct interpretation hinges on recognizing what decision trees are designed to do: model sequential choices with uncertainty by branching on possible outcomes, including demand levels. While there are practical considerations (such as tree size and discretization) that affect implementation, the fundamental concept aligns with sequential decision-making under demand uncertainty. The alternative view risks underestimating the method’s intended scope and utility.

MGS3100W05 25 Fall OM Final - Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Decision trees are useful for sequential decision-making under demand uncertainty.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题