Systematic decision making

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In approaching the topic of systematic decision making, we’ll examine what each option asserts and how they fit together.
Option 1: 'considers all of the pros and cons as well as the costs.' This statement emphasizes a thorough evaluation framework, taking into account benefits, drawbacks, and whether costs are justified. It aligns with the idea that systematic decision making weighs multiple factors before choosing.
Option 2: 'all of these.' This option claims that every listed aspect is part of systematic decision making, so its correctness depends on whether each other statement is indeed a valid component. If the other statements hold true, this one would be supported as well.
Option 3: 'requires you to be financially responsible.' This claim narrows systematic decision making to financial stewardship. While budgeting and cost awareness often accompany good decisions, the concept typically encompasses a broader range of factors (preferences, outcomes, risks) beyond finances alone. On its own, this is an incomplete or partially true aspect rather than a defining requirement.
Option 4: 'is the process of making choices that reflect your goals.' This describes a core purpose of systematic decision making: aligning choices with personal or organizational objectives. It captures the directional intent of making decisions in a goal-consistent way.
Taken together, Option 1 highlights a concrete evaluative method, Option 4 captures the alignment with goals, and Option 3 presents a narrower constraint that is not universally required by the notion of systematic decision making. Option 2 asserts that all of the foregoing are correct components, which would be consistent only if the other statements are indeed valid and complementary.
In summary, Option 1 emphasizes comprehensive analysis, Option 4 emphasizes goal alignment, and Option 3 presents a constraint that is not universally essential to the concept. The inclusion of 'all of these' as an option hinges on whether each individual statement is considered a valid facet of systematic decision making; understanding that context helps clarify why the combined statement may be considered accurate in many discussions of the topic.

Introduction to Personal Finance CP - 2 - Beatty - Preparatory Academy - 1st Semester - 2025/2026 Final Exam- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Systematic decision making

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Clark Kent is facing pressure to quickly come up with a solution to a software issue. He knows that his current solution solves most of the issues and would be good enough in the short term. If he moves forward with the solution he has now, he would be:

A manager is having a difficult time making a decision since there are many options to consider. What tool can help her evaluate her options?

Tony Stark is the head of the sales department. The department has not been meeting its sales goals for the past three months. He has empowered his team of sales representatives to make decisions on their own to resolve the issue. This is an example of _____________?

You attend a meeting and are surprised to learn that instead of having an open discussion, Steve Rogers has decided that each person will have a limited time to speak on each topic. Steve's action is best described as using......?

Which of the following statements explain why managers might not follow The Rational Model of Decision Making?

The pre-mortem exercise is primarily designed to speed up the decision-making process.

Nonprogrammed decisions are most likely to be made by ________-level managers.

Two managers are looking at the same sales data. One manager sees the data as evidence that the company is doing well. The other manager sees the data as evidence that the company needs to make some changes. What could explain this difference in interpretation?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单