You attend a meeting and are surprised to learn that instead of having an open discussion, Steve Rogers has decided that each person will have a limited time to speak on each topic. Steve's action is best described as using......?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: You attend a meeting and learn that instead of open discussion, Steve Rogers has set a limit on how long each person may speak on a topic. The action described is best described as using......?

Option 1: consensus decision making
- Analysis: Consensus decision making is a group process aimed at reaching agreement where all members support a decision. It emphasizes collaboration and shared control, not a time-limited speaking protocol. This option misaligns with the scenario, which focuses on restricting speaking time rather than seeking mutual agreement or shared ownership of the decision.

Option 2: Framing
- Analysis: Framing refers to presenting a problem or situation in a particular way to influence perceptions and interpretations. Implementing time limits on speaking does not inherently involve altering how the issue is presented to shape understanding; it is more about procedural rules than message framing. This choice is therefore not a direct fit for the described action.

Option 3: Distributive justice
- Analysis: Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of resources, benefits, or burdens among members. Applying speaking time limits is not about distributing resources or benefits equitably in the sense of fairness of outcomes; it is about controlling procedure. Hence, this option does not capture the essence of the action.

Option 4: Procedural Influence
- Analysis: Procedural influence centers on the rules, protocols, and structures that govern how decisions are made or discussions occur. Setting limited speaking times directly shapes the process of the meeting by constraining who can talk and for how long, thereby exerting procedural control over the discourse. This option aligns well with the described action.

Option 5: Consistency
- Analysis: Consistency typically refers to uniformity or reliability across actions, decisions, or messaging over time. While time-limiting speaking could be implemented consistently, the core concept in the scenario is about the method of governance during discussion, not the notion of maintaining uniformity across instances. This makes it a less accurate fit for the described action.

In sum, the scenario centers on altering the meeting’s process through time-bound speaking rules rather than pursuing consensus, reframing the issue, distributing resources, or emphasizing consistency. The most fitting concept is Procedural Influence because it captures the effect of procedural constraints on how discussions unfold.

33:620:302:01 MANAGEMENT SKILLS Final Exam

You attend a meeting and are surprised to learn that instead of having an open discussion, Steve Rogers has decided that each person will have a limited time to speak on each topic. Steve's action is best described as using......?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Clark Kent is facing pressure to quickly come up with a solution to a software issue. He knows that his current solution solves most of the issues and would be good enough in the short term. If he moves forward with the solution he has now, he would be:

A manager is having a difficult time making a decision since there are many options to consider. What tool can help her evaluate her options?

Tony Stark is the head of the sales department. The department has not been meeting its sales goals for the past three months. He has empowered his team of sales representatives to make decisions on their own to resolve the issue. This is an example of _____________?

Which of the following statements explain why managers might not follow The Rational Model of Decision Making?

The pre-mortem exercise is primarily designed to speed up the decision-making process.

Nonprogrammed decisions are most likely to be made by ________-level managers.

Systematic decision making

Two managers are looking at the same sales data. One manager sees the data as evidence that the company is doing well. The other manager sees the data as evidence that the company needs to make some changes. What could explain this difference in interpretation?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单