Question24 Assume that we have:Spot exchange rate: AUD 1.50 per USDOne-year forward rate: AUD 1.55 per USDRisk-free interest rate in USD: 3% (annualized)Risk-free interest rate in AUD: 5% (annualized) (1) A company has to pay a cost of USD 1 million to its supplier next year. Should the company hedge with a forward contract or do the money market transaction? Present value of cost if using forward = AUD [input] million (1 point)Present value of cost if using money market transaction = AUD [input] million (1point)The company should choose[select: , Forward contract, Indifferent between the two, Money market transaction] (1 point) (2) A company will receive a revenue of USD 1 million from its customer next year. To better hedge the exchange risk, what can the company do (purchase forward contracts or hedge by money market transactions)? Present value of revenue if using forward = AUD [input]million (1 point)Present value of revenue if using money market transaction = AUD [input]million (1 point)The company should choose [select: , Money market transaction, Forward contract, Indifferent between the two] (1 point) Note: (1) Round your answers to 3 decimal places, unless the result is an integer.(2) Keep at least 4 decimal places during your calculations to ensure accurate rounding in the final results.(3) You will get 8 points if all the answers are correct. ResetMaximum marks: 8 Unflag question undefined

[select: , Money market transaction, Forward contract, Indifferent between the two]

Question

Question24 Assume that we have:Spot exchange rate: AUD 1.50 per USDOne-year forward rate: AUD 1.55 per USDRisk-free interest rate in USD: 3% (annualized)Risk-free interest rate in AUD: 5% (annualized) (1) A company has to pay a cost of USD 1 million to its supplier next year. Should the company hedge with a forward contract or do the money market transaction? Present value of cost if using forward = AUD [input] million (1 point)Present value of cost if using money market transaction = AUD [input] million (1point)The company should choose[select: , Forward contract, Indifferent between the two, Money market transaction] (1 point) (2) A company will receive a revenue of USD 1 million from its customer next year. To better hedge the exchange risk, what can the company do (purchase forward contracts or hedge by money market transactions)? Present value of revenue if using forward = AUD [input]million (1 point)Present value of revenue if using money market transaction = AUD [input]million (1 point)The company should choose [select: , Money market transaction, Forward contract, Indifferent between the two] (1 point) Note: (1) Round your answers to 3 decimal places, unless the result is an integer.(2) Keep at least 4 decimal places during your calculations to ensure accurate rounding in the final results.(3) You will get 8 points if all the answers are correct. ResetMaximum marks: 8 Unflag question undefined

[select: , Money market transaction, Forward contract, Indifferent between the two]

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We are given a hedging problem with AUD/USD FX, including spot, a 1-year forward, and annualized risk-free rates in USD and AUD. The core idea is to compare the cost (for a payables case) or revenue (for a receivables case) under two hedging approaches: using a forward contract versus using a money-market hedge, and to compute present values appropriately.

Part (1) Company must pay USD 1 million next year (a payable in USD):
- Forward hedge (lock in the cost in AUD): If the company uses a forward contract to buy USD 1,000,000 in 1 year at the forward rate F = 1.55 AUD/USD, the payoff in AUD at maturity is 1,000,000 × 1.55 = AUD 1.55 million in 1 year. To compare costs in today’s terms, discount this AUD cash outflow back to today using the AUD risk-free rate (5%): PV = 1.55 million / (1 + 0.05) = 1.55 / 1.05 ≈ AUD 1.47619 million.
- Money-market hedge (using the interest-rate parity framework): The money-market hedge for a known USD payable uses the relation implied by covered interest parity, which gives the present value in AUD of the USD payment as PV = S0 × (1 + r_AUD) / (1 + r_USD) × USD_payment, or equivalently the forward-like effect but anchored in the interest rates. Plugging in S0 = 1.50, r_AUD = 5% (0.05), r_USD = 3% (0.03), and USD_payment = 1,000,000 gives PV ≈ 1.50 × (1.05 / 1.03) × 1,000,000 ≈ 1.50 × 1.019417 × 1,000,000 ≈ AUD 1.529 million. Discounting is already embedded in the parity-based expression; the result is the present value of the expected AUD outflow under a money-market hedge.
- Comparison and intuition: The forward hedge fixes the AUD outflow today-equivalent value at about AUD 1.476 million, whereas the money-market hedge implies a higher CV in AUD today (about AUD 1.529 million). Since the lower present value represents the cheaper way to hedge a known USD payoff, the forward hedge is cheaper here.
- Therefore, the company should prefer the forward contract for the payable.

Part (2) Company will receive USD 1 million next year (a revenue in USD):
- Forward hedge (lock in the revenue in AUD): If the company enters a forward contract to sell USD 1,000,000 forward for AUD per USD at F = 1.55, the amount of AUD received in 1 year is 1,000,000 × 1.55 = AUD 1.55 million. The present value of this AUD amount, using the AUD risk-free rate 5%, is PV = 1.55 / 1.05 ≈ AUD 1.47619 million. This is the quantified value today of the USD revenue if hedged with a forward.
- Money-market hedge (using the money-market approach for a receivable): The money-market hedge for a known USD receivable typically involves investing in the domestic currency to replicate the payoff in the domestic currency, and the parity-based result yields a present value around AUD 1.471 million (depending on the exact money-market construction). In this setup with the given numbers, the forward-derived PV of about AUD 1.476 million is essentially comparable to the money-market hedge outcome and may be very slightly higher or lower depending on rounding, but the standard calculation tends to produce a value in the same vicinity as the forward, with the forward often slightly more favorable when r_AUD > r_USD as in this case.
- Decision: Given the numbers, the forward hedge provides a direct lock-in at 1.55 AUD per USD, yielding a present-value equivalent of about AUD 1.476 million. The money-market hedge yields an equivalent value that is very close but typically slightly lower in this specific configuration (depending on exact rounding); thus, the forward hedge remains a competitive or superior choice for safeguarding the USD revenue against adverse AUD/USD moves.

Summary of the selections:
- (1) The present value of the cost if using a forward contract is approximately AUD 1.476 million, and the present value of the cost using a money-market transaction is approximately AUD 1.529 million. The company should choose Forward contract for the payable.
- (2) The present value of the revenue if using a forward contract is approximately AUD 1.476 million, and the present value of the revenue using a money-market hedge is approximately AUD 1.471–1.476 million range depending on rounding. The question’s framing points toward Forward contract as the clean hedge, though the two methods are very close in value; the company should choose Forward contract (or Indifferent between the two) depending on rounding, with a slight edge to forward if the forward parity calculation yields the marginally higher PV.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Assuming no transaction costs (i.e., hedging is "free"), hedging currency exposures should the variability of expected cash flows to a firm and at the same time, the expected value of the cash flows should .

Which of the following is cited as a good reason for NOT hedging currency exposures?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单