The practice problems for the case study are a new resource this semester. For each option below, please indicate your frequency of use for the practice problems and the extent to which you find them a helpful resource.

1. How often did you complete the practice problems for the case studies? I completed all 5 practice problems

2. How helpful did you find the practice problems for the case studies? Very helpful

Question

The practice problems for the case study are a new resource this semester. For each option below, please indicate your frequency of use for the practice problems and the extent to which you find them a helpful resource.

1. How often did you complete the practice problems for the case studies? I completed all 5 practice problems

2. How helpful did you find the practice problems for the case studies? Very helpful

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, restating the task setup helps orient the analysis: this item asks you to indicate two separate survey dimensions—(a) how often you completed the practice problems, and (b) how helpful you found the practice problems.

Option analysis for the first dropdown item: 'I completed all 5 practice problems'. This response directly answers the frequency question posed in the prompt, conveying full completion of the set of problems. It implies consistency and thorough engagement with the practice materials. A potential nuance to consider is whether there were any missing attempts or partial completions that might not be captured by this binary or absolute phrasing; if the intent was to capture exact frequency, the wording here communicates a clear, complete effort.

Option analysis for the second dropdown item: 'Very helpful'. This response clearly addresses the perceived usefulness or value of the practice problems for the case studies. Describing the resource as 'Very helpful' signals strong perceived benefit, which might reflect deeper understanding, improved performance, or positive study experience. If one wanted more granularity, they could have used a scaled rating (e.g., somewhat helpful, neutral, very helpful), but the chosen descriptor communicates a high level of usefulness.

Given there are no additional answer options to evaluate, there isn’t a need to discard or compare alternative choices. The two provided responses together form a coherent set of Likert-like self-assessment statements about engagement (frequency) and perceived value (helpfulness).

If you were to critique the structure from a survey design perspective, you might note:
- The frequency item uses a specific numeric completion (all 5 problems), which is precise and unambiguous.
- The helpfulness item uses a categorical descriptor ('Very helpful'), which is simple and interpretable but may reduce nuance compared to a multi-point scale or a numeric rating.

In summary, the two options chosen align with the two distinct questions in the prompt: one for frequency of completion, one for perceived helpfulness. The phrasing is clear, direct, and easy for respondents to answer without confusion.

PHR 2410 SP2025 (36478) MODULE 7 | Course Check-in #3

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

This course is a very cool course because:

This course is meeting my needs and goals.

BONUS POINTS: Lecture content was momentarily interrupted by a live duet performance — and we’re all better for it.

This course is a very cool course because:

This is a very cool course because:

The in class tutorial activities will help me with the exam

The pace of this course was:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单