This course is meeting my needs and goals.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the prompt and the available choices to ensure clarity: the statement is 'This course is meeting my needs and goals.' The options are a 5-point Likert scale: 5 (strongly agree), 4, 3, 2, 1 (strongly disagree).
Option 1: 5 (strongly agree). Choosing this would indicate a very high level of satisfaction, that the course is fully aligning with the student’s needs and goals. This would imply near-perfect utility and could be expected if the course precisely matches expectations and delivers maximum value.
Option 2: 4. This choice signals a solid positive assessment, suggesting the course largely meets needs and goals but with some small reservations or room for improvement. It’s a strong but not perfect endorsement.
Option 3: 3. This corresponds to a neutral or mid-point rating, meaning the course meets some needs and goals but not others, or that the fit is average—neither clearly satisfying nor clearly failing to do so. It often reflects mixed experiences or trade-offs.
Option 4: 2. Selecting this would indicate disagreement or dissatisfaction, suggesting the course fails to meet several needs or goals, and improvements are needed to align with what the student is seeking.
Option 5: 1 (strongly disagree). This expresses a strong belief that the course does not meet needs and goals at all, signaling significant misalignment and likely broad issues with the course experience.
Now, evaluating the options in terms of what each implies about meeting needs and goals:
- If the student felt the course exceeded expectations and fully satisfied their needs, Option 1 would be appropriate. It would imply the course is highly effective for the individual.
- If the student felt the course was generally helpful but with some gaps, Option 2 would fit, signaling a positive experience with notable room for improvement.
- If the student felt the course was only average in its ability to meet needs and goals, Option 3 is the natural choice, representing a middle ground where some aspects work and others do not.
- If the student perceived several unmet needs or mismatches between the course and goals, Option 4 would reflect dissatisfaction and indicate attention areas.
- If the student perceived almost no alignment between the course and their needs/goals, Option 5 would be the strongest critique.
Looking at the structure of Likert-style items, the mid-point (Option 3) is often used to express neither agreement nor strong disagreement, capturing a balanced or uncertain stance. This form of reasoning helps distinguish clear endorsement (Options 1–2) from clear discontent (Options 4–5) and from neutrality (Option 3).
In terms of potential misconceptions: choosing 5 or 4 when the experience includes meaningful gaps would overstate satisfaction; choosing 2 or 1 when there is any useful value would understate the benefits. The neutral option (3) is appropriate when the student perceives a mix of positives and negatives without a clear tilt toward strong agreement or disagreement.
Overall, each option maps to a distinct stance on how well the course aligns with needs and goals, with Option 3 signaling a middle-ground assessment that the course meets some needs but not others, or only to a moderate extent.

GEL 020 001 FQ 2025 Request for Mid-Quarter Input

This course is meeting my needs and goals.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

This course is a very cool course because:

BONUS POINTS: Lecture content was momentarily interrupted by a live duet performance — and we’re all better for it.

This course is a very cool course because:

This is a very cool course because:

The in class tutorial activities will help me with the exam

The pace of this course was:

The amount of content per class overall was

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单