题目
GBSH0024_25-26 Quiz for week 5
多项选择题
An economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial can produce misleading cost-effectiveness estimate of the intervention if:
选项
A.a. There is only one relevant trial
B.b. The trial does not include the appropriate comparator
C.c. Health related quality of life was the primary outcome in the trial
D.d. Trial population differs from the typical population to receive intervention (e.g. younger and/or healthier)
E.e. The trial was executed in a different country

查看解析
标准答案
Please login to view
思路分析
When evaluating how an economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial can yield a misleading cost-effectiveness estimate, we need to consider factors that distort the applicability or relevance of the findings across target settings.
Option a: 'There is only one relevant trial' Regarding this choice, having a single relevant trial doesn’t by itself create a misleading cost-effectiveness estimate. Although reliance on a single study can introduce uncertainty and limit generalizability, the statement as a blanket condition does not necessarily imply misestimation of cost-effectiveness. The mislead......Login to view full explanation登录即可查看完整答案
我们收录了全球超50000道考试原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。
类似问题
In reports of economic evaluations alongside clinical trials, we present:
In economic evaluations alongside randomised clinical trials:
Which of the following statements about cost effectiveness analysis is true? Cost-effectiveness analysis:
In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things
更多留学生实用工具
希望你的学习变得更简单
加入我们,立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析,让复习快人一步!