Malaysia rejects CPI as an indicator of corruption perception in the country

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let's examine the statement and the two possible responses carefully.
Option True: The assertion is that Malaysia rejects CPI as an indicator of corruption perception in the country. This would imply that official discourse or domestic assessment does not view Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) as a valid or representative measure of corruption in Malaysia. In some contexts, policymakers or commentators may criticize CPI for methodological reasons, data sources, or comparability across countries, leading to a stance that CPI should not be used as the sole indicator of corruption perception. This option would be plausible if there is notable official tension or rejection in Malaysian discourse toward CPI.
Option False: Claiming that Malaysia does not reject CPI would mean the country fully accepts CPI as a valid indicator of its corruption perception and uses it as a reference in policy or analysis. This would contrast with the notion of rejection and would be factual only if there is explicit approval and integration of CPI in national assessment, which may not align with statements that criticize CPI or seek alternative indicators.
Now, evaluating the nuances: the CPI is a global index produced by an international organization and is often discussed in the context of cross-country comparisons. A country might contest certain aspects of CPI but still engage with it for benchmarking; alternatively, it may openly reject it as a measure due to methodological concerns or political messaging. The correctness of the statement hinges on whether there is a documented stance by Malaysia rejecting CPI as an indicator. Given that the provided answer marks True, we proceed with the understanding that there is at least some credible position or discourse reflecting rejection or non-endorsement of CPI as a pure indicator of the country’s corruption perception.
If we consider the counter-arguments: rejecting CPI does not necessarily mean there is no awareness of CPI or that it is completely disregarded; some nations critique or selectively use CPI rather than fully endorse it. The key misstep would be treating CPI as the only valid measure of corruption perception or assuming universal agreement on its interpretation in every national context.
In summary, option True contends that Malaysia rejects CPI as the indicator of corruption perception in the country, which is consistent with scenarios where official or scholarly discourse questions CPI’s applicability or representation for Malaysia. Option False asserts universal acceptance and use of CPI, which would be inconsistent with a stance of rejection or criticism; thus it would be incorrect if the stance is indeed rejection.

Integrity and Anti-Corruption Course (082025-NUF) Topic 1 Quiz

Malaysia rejects CPI as an indicator of corruption perception in the country

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单