An exemption clause is construed by looking at the contract as a whole, including the exemption clause, and interpreting it according to the natural and ordinary meaning of the words. This is called the

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When analyzing the question, we start by identifying what the clause is called in contract interpretation.
Option a: 'a. Reasonable person test' corresponds to interpreting the contract by considering how a reasonable person would understand the words in their ordinary and natural meaning, which aligns with common contract interpretation principles.
Option b: 'PER' stands for certain legal terms like 'partial exemption clause' in some jurisdictions, but this acronym does not describe the method of interpretation described in the prompt, making it an inaccurate label here.
Option c: 'RNT' is not a standard, recognized term for the approach to interpreting exemption clauses in contract law; it appears to be a non-native or incorrect abbreviation, so it misleadingly labels the method.
Option d: 'RBT' likewise is not a recognized term for this interpretive approach and does not match the description given in the question, rendering it incorrect.
In terms of the underlying concept, the question emphasizes looking at the contract as a whole and using ordinary meaning, which is a hallmark of the reasonable person standard in contract interpretation, rather than relying on narrower or misnamed frameworks.
Thus, the correct framing relies on the notion of understanding the clause through the lens of how a reasonable person would read the contract, applying ordinary language interpretation across the document.

An exemption clause is construed by looking at the contract as a whole, including the exemption clause, and interpreting it according to the natural and ordinary meaning of the words. This is called the

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which intepretation rule states that the exemption clause is intended to cover only the matters contained in the contract.