Students using the guide prepared by the tutoring group to complete the assignment could be accused of:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Students using the guide prepared by the tutoring group to complete the assignment could be accused of:

Option 1: engaging in contract cheating
- This option targets the idea that using a guide from another party to complete an assignment constitutes contract cheating, where a student outsourcing work to someone else or using unauthorized help violates academic integrity policies. The reasoning is that the student is relying on external assistance to produce work that should be their own, effectively entering into an implicit agreement with another party to have the work completed for them.

Option 2: engaging in illegitimate cooperation
- Illegitimate cooperation refers to improper collaboration or sharing of work beyond what is allowed by the instructor. If the guide is intended as a resource and the student uses it in ways that exceed permitted collaboration, this could be argued. However, the core issue with using an external guide to complete an assignment typically falls under contract cheating, since it involves outsourcing the actual task rather than merely cooperating within allowed boundaries. This makes the option less precise as the primary accusation.

Option 3: receiving inappropriate help from another person
- This option asserts that the student is receiving help that is deemed inappropriate. While using a tutoring guide could be considered inappropriate depending on policy, the phrasing here is vague and broad. It does not explicitly capture the notion of completing the work on behalf of the student, which contract cheating does. The claim could be argued, but it lacks specificity about the nature of the help (external completion vs. inappropriate advice).

Option 4: nothing, the guide was just an extra resource
- This asserts there is no issue and that the guide is only an optional resource. If the policy prohibits using external materials to complete assignments, this option would be incorrect. It contradicts typical academic integrity standards that distinguish authorized assistance from completing work for a student. Therefore, this choice would generally be inconsistent with strict interpretations of contract cheating.

Summary: The central concern with a tutoring guide used to finish an assignment is that the student is outsourcing the work to someone else, which aligns with the definition of contract cheating. The other options either blur the lines of policy, describe a less precise problem, or downplay the potential breach by treating the guide as merely an optional resource. The instructional context emphasizes safeguarding academic integrity by recognizing unauthorized external completion as a violation rather than acceptable help.

2025_UNIV_AHEM Module 4 Scenario

Students using the guide prepared by the tutoring group to complete the assignment could be accused of:

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

以下哪项可归类为合同欺诈？（选择所有适用的答案）

Eve has been hearing about ChatGPT and similar chatbots on the news and she decided to have one of these tools complete the work for her. This situation is an example of unacceptable behaviour called...

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单