According to the economic assumptions about consumer choice, could Mary have optimally chosen to purchase one mask and 48 units of other goods per day?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about whether Mary could have optimally chosen a basket consisting of one mask and 48 units of other goods per day, under the economic assumptions about consumer choice.
First, note that there are no answer options provided for us to compare. In such cases, we can still evaluate the given proposed answer statement in light of standard consumer theory.
The proposed statement is: 'No, even though this basket was affordable, it was not optimal because it was to the south-west of the budget line.'
Under typical consumer choice with monotonic preferences (goods are desirable and more is better) and a stable budget, any affordable (feasible) bundle that is not on the budget line is interior relative to the budget constraint. If preferences are strictly increasing in both goods, the consumer can always reach a higher indifference curve by spending more of the budget, i.e., by moving toward and onto the budget line, without violating the budget. Therefore, an interior bundle—one that lies strictly inside or to the south-west of the budget line—cannot be the utility-maximizing choice because a higher level of consumption along the budget line would yield higher utility.
This logic makes the judgement in the statement coherent: a bundle that is affordable but lies to the south-west of the budget line is not optimal, since the optimal point should typically lie on the budget line given positive marginal utilities and no satiation that would cap consumption at a lower level.
However, it is worth noting a caveat: if Mary’s preferences exhibited satiation or the goods included a bad or inferior good, or if there were binding non-negativity constraints that prevented increasing both goods, certain interior solutions could in principle be optimal. In standard teaching, with goods that are desirable and no satiation, the optimal point lies on the budget line, and any bundle south-west of it would be suboptimal.
In summary, the claim that an affordable basket located south-west of the budget line is not optimal aligns with the core idea that, with typical goods and monotone preferences, the optimal choice lies on the budget line, making interior (south-west) bundles suboptimal.

SIPAIA6400_001-002_2025_3 - Microeconomic Analysis for International and Public Affairs

According to the economic assumptions about consumer choice, could Mary have optimally chosen to purchase one mask and 48 units of other goods per day?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

This question has been regraded. Suppose that basket B (x = 5, y = 10) is on Matt's linear budget line, Matt's MRSX,Y (B) = 1/4, PX =$2 and PY = $2. Matt's preferences are represented by smooth curves.

Which of the following is an assumption of the decision-making process followed by consumers to maximize utility?

[Continuation of question 14] Given that the original optimal basket (x = 50, y = 50) is just affordable on the new budget line, will the original optimal basket remain the optimal basket at the new income and prices?

Suppose that Tom's preferences are convex and that Tom's income is $100, the price of food, good X, is $1 per unit and the price of other goods, good Y, is $1 per unit. Under these circumstances, Tom optimally purchases 50 units of food. Then Tom optimally spends:

Suppose that basket B (x = 5, y = 10) is on Matt's linear budget line, Matt's MRSX,Y (B) = 1/4, PX =$2 and PY = $2. Matt's preferences are represented by smooth curves.

Which of the following statements is TRUE?

A consumer's choices are directly influenced by all of the following except Blank ______. BlackTom题目解析

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单