How does clinical prediction perform worse than statistical prediction?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: How does clinical prediction perform worse than statistical prediction?

Option provided: 'Clinical prediction overweights case characteristics and ignores base rates.'

Now, let's analyze why this statement captures a key reason clinical prediction can underperform compared with statistical prediction.

- The idea that clinical judgment overweights salient or vivid case characteristics aligns with the well-documented tendency of experts to rely on memorable details or single cases rather than aggregate information. This can lead to biased weightings that do not reflect the overall distribution of outcomes.

- Ignoring base rates refers to neglecting prior probabilities or base-rate information about how common certain outcomes are in the population. Statistical models routinely incorporate base rates, which helps calibrate predictions to the actual likelihood of events. When clinicians focus on individual features without considering how often those features occur in the population, their predictions can become systematically miscalibrated.

- In statistical prediction, information from many cases is combined in a principled way (e.g., through regression or other models) to estimate the relationship between predictors and outcomes. This averaging effect reduces random noise and makes predictions more reliable across different contexts.

- In contrast, clinical prediction often relies on heuristics or personal experience, which may be influenced by cognitive biases such as availability, representativeness, or overconfidence. These biases can distort the perceived importance of certain case characteristics and downplay the importance of base-rate data.

- As a result, the misweighting of case characteristics and the neglect of base rates contribute to poorer calibration (predicted probabilities do not match observed frequencies) and potentially worse discrimination (ability to distinguish between outcomes) compared to properly specified statistical models.

- It is also useful to note that statistical models can systematically integrate multiple predictors, interactions, and non-linear effects in ways that human judgment may miss. This computational leverage often yields more accurate and stable predictions across varying populations and conditions.

- In sum, the statement captures two core mechanisms by which clinical prediction tends to underperform: (1) overemphasizing vivid but idiosyncratic case features, and (2) ignoring base-rate information that anchors predictions to the true prevalence of outcomes. These factors together explain why statistical approaches usually outperform clinical judgment in predictive accuracy.

PSYC20007_2025_SM2 Week 12: Judgment and Decision-Making 第 12 周：判断与决策

How does clinical prediction perform worse than statistical prediction?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

How does clinical prediction perform worse than statistical prediction?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单