This is an "either/or" question, because you have the option to participate either in-person or in the online discussion.

If you are participating in person: "I participated at least 3 times in class today, either in small groups, the large class, or a combination." (answer yes or no)

OR!!!

If you are participating in the online discussion: "I contributed at least 150 words total to the online discussion." (answer yes or no)

Question

This is an "either/or" question, because you have the option to participate either in-person or in the online discussion.

If you are participating in person: "I participated at least 3 times in class today, either in small groups, the large class, or a combination." (answer yes or no)

OR!!!

If you are participating in the online discussion: "I contributed at least 150 words total to the online discussion." (answer yes or no)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents an either/or participation check with two possible modes: in-person or online.
Option set overview: there are no explicit answer choices provided in the answer_options field, but the prompt itself describes two distinct criteria that could yield a yes: (a) in-person participation meeting 'at least 3 times in class today' (via small groups, large class, or both) or (b) online participation meeting 'at least 150 words total' in the online discussion.
First, consider the in-person path: if you attended and contributed in class at least three times today, you should answer yes for that path. The criterion is a straightforward tally of participation instances in any combination of in-class formats. If you meet this threshold, the in-person option's yes is satisfied.
Next, consider the online path: if your online contributions accumulate to at least 150 words total, you should answer yes for that path as well. This requires a cumulative word count that reaches or exceeds 150 words across the online discussion.
Now, what about the absence of explicit answer options? Since the answer_options array is empty, we cannot analyze alternative choices within the multiple-choice format. In a typical setup, you would compare possible responses like 'Yes' for meeting criteria in one path, 'No' for not meeting criteria in either path, or other nuanced options describing partial fulfillment. Here, the only provided answer in the answer field is 'yes,' which implies that the student who has met the stated condition on the chosen path should select yes.
Consider potential misconceptions:
- It’s easy to confuse participation with mere presence; the criteria require counting actual participation events or issued word count, not simply showing up.
- If you contributed in person but did not reach three instances, or conversely wrote fewer than 150 words online, you would not meet the specified threshold on that path, so the appropriate choice would be no for that path.
- If someone pursued both modes, only one path needs to be satisfied to justify a yes on the corresponding option, but without explicit options, the interpretation hinges on which path the student used.
In summary, given the described criteria, the correct response hinges on whether you met the specific threshold for your selected participation mode. If you did meet either the three in-person interactions or the 150-word online contribution, selecting yes is appropriate. If you did not meet the threshold in the chosen mode, a no would be the proper choice. The empty answer_options prevents evaluating alternative selections beyond the provided yes, so the analysis focuses on understanding the two criteria and their thresholds.

PHIL 220-001 Tues 4/29 Attendance and Participation (Norton-Smith)

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

When students attend the class meeting, whether the meeting is Face to Face or online, they should do all of these things except:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单