I arrived to class on time and stayed until the end.

(If you were not present, the answer to this is no. If you arrived late or left early, the answer is also no, but you may still earn points in the other questions.)

Question

I arrived to class on time and stayed until the end.

(If you were not present, the answer to this is no. If you arrived late or left early, the answer is also no, but you may still earn points in the other questions.)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The provided data includes a question stem about attendance behavior: 'I arrived to class on time and stayed until the end.' The note in parentheses clarifies how to treat cases where a student was not present, arrived late, or left early, and mentions you may still earn points in other questions. However, there are no answer options supplied for this multiple-choice item, which means there is no explicit set of choices to evaluate.

Because the question lacks answer options, we cannot perform a standard option-by-option analysis. In a typical multiple-choice format, we would list each option, assess its truthfulness or alignment with the stated policy, and explain why it is correct or incorrect. Without those options, we must rely on the accompanying information to reason about the statement itself.

If we consider the logic of the stem and its parenthetical guidance: the claim 'I arrived to class on time and stayed until the end' describes a student who was present for the entire session. The parenthetical note indicates that if you were not present, or if you arrived late or left early, the answer to this item would be no. This suggests the intended truth condition is that only a perfect on-time, full-duration attendance yields a 'yes' response, while any deviation yields 'no.'

Potential misconceptions to avoid:
- Assuming a 'yes' is always the correct response regardless of attendance timing. The parenthetical explicitly states deviations yield 'no.'
- Believing that you can earn points on this item even if you were late or left early. The note states you may still earn points in other questions, but not for this statement.
- Treating the statement as universally true for all classes or contexts. The policy described seems specific to this assessment item and its scoring rules.

In summary, with no answer options present, the analysis can only interpret the stem and the parenthetical guidance to conclude that the statement would be true only for a student who arrived on time and remained until the end, and false otherwise. The absence of explicit options prevents a definitive option-by-option justification, but the logical reading of the provided guidance supports that interpretation.

PHIL 220-001 Thurs 3/27 Attendance and Participation (Miller)

I arrived to class on time and stayed until the end. (If you were not present, the answer to this is no. If you arrived late or left early, the answer is also no, but you may still earn points in the other questions.)

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Iam present in class today. If you are not in class when this AQ opens, select NO below. If you have a valid reason for your absence, speak with Dr. P next class. Do not attempt to earn 0.5 points dishonestly.

This subject has scheduled classes that you must attend.

I arrived to class on time and stayed until the end. (If you were not present, the answer to this is no. If you arrived late or left early, the answer is also no, but you may still earn points in the other questions.)

Do you typically attend lecture?

How often do you attend class?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单