Part 1While legislation enacted in 1998 granted the Bank of Japan new powers and greater autonomy, its critics contend that:Part 2
A. its independence is too great since the Ministry of Finance no longer has veto power over the Bank's budget. B. its independence is too great because it need not pursue a policy of price stability even if that is the popular will of the people C. its independence is limited since the Ministry of Finance can dismiss senior bank officials D. its independence is limited by the Ministry of Finance's veto power over part of the Bank's budget E. None of the above are correct

Question

Part 1While legislation enacted in 1998 granted the Bank of Japan new powers and greater​ autonomy, its critics contend​ that:Part 2
A. its independence is too great since the Ministry of Finance no longer has veto power over the​ Bank's budget. B. its independence is too great because it need not pursue a policy of price stability even if that is the popular will of the people C. its independence is limited since the Ministry of Finance can dismiss senior bank officials D. its independence is limited by the Ministry of​ Finance's veto power over part of the​ Bank's budget E. None of the above are correct

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Part 1 asks about criticisms of the 1998 legislation granting the Bank of Japan new powers and autonomy. The options present various claims about how independent the BOJ is. We will analyze each option in turn, noting why it is correct or incorrect and referring to plausible macroeconomic governance concepts.

A. 'its independence is too great since the Ministry of Finance no longer has veto power over the Bank's budget.'
This option claims independence increased because the MOF no longer vetoes the BOJ budget. In reality, the scenario described in the question is about increased autonomy granted to the BOJ, not about removing veto power. The criticism that independence is 'too great' would more plausibly focus on insensitivity to democratic accountability or policy misalignment with public will, rather than on budget veto power changes. Therefore, this choice mischaracterizes the typical concern; it reverses the direction of influence by implying loss of veto rather than gain of autonomy, and it also specifies a change (no veto) that may not align with the actual legislative change.

B. 'its independence is too great because it need not pursue a policy of price stability even if that is the popular will of the people.'
This option argues for a monetary authority that could ignore public preference about price stability. However, standard criticisms of central bank independence focus on the risk of politicization or of misalignment with short-term popular demands, not on the idea that independence would free the bank from pursuing price stability altogether. Price stability is a core mandate in many central banking frameworks; arguing that independence implies not pursuing price stability contradicts the typical role of an independent central bank and misreads how independence relates to policy objectives. Thus, this statement is conceptually flawed as an explanation of concerns about autonomy.

C. 'its independence is limited since the Ministry of Finance can dismiss senior bank officials' 
This option asserts that MOF retains control over senior BOJ personnel decisions, which would indeed limit independence. If true, it presents a direct mechanism by which political authorities can constrain the central bank. This aligns with common criticisms that even with formal independence, oversight or personnel controls by a government ministry can curb autonomy. The plausibility of a dismissal power exists in some regulatory arrangements, making this a reasonable critique path. However, the accuracy depends on the actual constitutional design; the statement fits a plausible limitation mechanism, and deserves careful consideration of institutional detail.

D. 'its independence is limited by the Ministry of ​ Finance's veto power over part of the ​ Bank's budget' 
This option states that the Ministry of Finance retains veto power over part of the BOJ's budget, thereby directly constraining its financial autonomy. If such veto power exists, it would clearly cap the central bank's discretion and budgetary independence, making this a straightforward and credible criticism of independence. This aligns with the typical concern that formal independence can be constrained through budgetary oversight or line-item vetoes. Given the wording, this option presents a precise and known mechanism through which independence could be limited, making it a strong candidate for the intended correct answer.

E. 'None of the above are correct' 
If D accurately captures a real constraint (veto power over part of the budget), then 'None of the above' would be incorrect. Since D presents a plausible and concrete limitation, this option would be false in that scenario. Without assuming the real-world fact pattern, one could argue for or against E, but given the typical analysis of independence constraints via budgetary control, E is unlikely to be correct if D reflects an actual arrangement.

In summary, options A and B misstate or misinterpret the implications of central bank independence and do not align with standard critiques. Option C describes a plausible, albeit institution-specific, limiting mechanism. Option D identifies a concrete and direct budgetary constraint that is a common and credible way that independence can be limited. Option E would only be true if none of A–D described a real constraint, which is unlikely given the common structure of fiscal- and monetary-authority relationships. Therefore, the analysis points toward D as the mechanism through which independence could be limited, explaining why critics might argue the independence is not absolute.

Homework:Chapter 16 Homework

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A central bank is said to be "independent" if it is

Regarding central bank independence,

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单