Based on Darley and Batson (1973), if you wanted to encourage someone to help a person in need, what would you encourage them to do?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Based on Darley and Batson (1973), if you wanted to encourage someone to help a person in need, what would you encourage them to do?

Answer options:
A. Think about the Good Samaritan parable.
B. Go to seminary school.
C. Make them feel like they were in a hurry.
D. Make them feel like they weren’t in a hurry, and had ample time.

Analysis of each option:
Option A: Think about the Good Samaritan parable. This suggestion might conceptually prime prosocial thoughts or moral reasoning, but the specific experimental manipulation in the Darley and Batson study focused on situational cues, especially time pressure, rather than religious or parable-based reflection. Therefore, while it could have some influence, it does not capture the core manipulation demonstrated in the study and is not the most direct method identified by the research.

Option B: Go to seminary school. This option implies a long-term educational change and is not something the study investigated as a practical cue to increase helping in the moment. It is not grounded in the experimental findings on situational factors like time pressure and does not provide the immediate, situational adjustment the question seeks.

Option C: Make them feel like they were in a hurry. This would increase time pressure, which prior research by Darley and Batson actually found reduced helping behavior. The logic here is inverted relative to the study’s conclusions, so this option is inconsistent with the empirical results and would likely hinder helping rather than encourage it.

Option D: Make them feel like they weren’t in a hurry, and had ample time. This option aligns with the study’s core finding: reducing perceived time pressure or giving the person ample time increases the likelihood of helping. The experimental design showed that higher perceived urgency decreased helping, whereas more time and fewer competing demands increased prosocial action.

Putting it together, the reasoning points to option D as the correct approach, since it directly implements the situational cue (ample time) demonstrated to enhance helping in the Darley and Batson framework, while the other options either lack direct alignment with the manipulated variable or contradict the observed pattern of results.

PSYC20009_2025_SM2 Supplementary or Special Exam: Personality and Social Psychology (PSYC20009_2025_SM2)- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Based on Darley and Batson (1973), if you wanted to encourage someone to help a person in need, what would you encourage them to do?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following is NOT one of the factors that increases the likelihood of bystanders helping?

In which of the following situations would someone be most likely to help, instead of engaging in the bystander effect?

According to the research of Latané and Darley, which of the following situations would be the most likely in which someone would offer to help?

The “bystander effect” states that a particular bystander is less likely to give aid if

Who among the following is most likely to help an injured pedestrian?

A stranger has collapsed on a city sidewalk due to a heart attack. According to Darley and Latané, what is the first thing that must happen before you will help in this emergency?

You trip over a fallen branch and sprain your ankle. According to research on the bystander effect, a stranger who sees your plight will be most likely to offer aid if there are________ others present.

Beatriz fell on a busy city sidewalk and broke her leg. Although hundreds of pedestrians saw her lying on the ground, most failed to recognize that she was in need of medical assistance. Their oversight best illustrates one of the dynamics involved in

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单