Which statement is correct, in relation to behavioural economics?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks: 'Which statement is correct, in relation to behavioural economics?'.

Key observation: The provided data includes an answer field stating "b. Behavioural economics theories are based around the assumption that human beings are motivated by psychological, social and emotional factors." but the answer_options array is empty, so we do not have a full list of alternative statements to compare against. This means we cannot perform a complete option-by-option evaluation across all choices. Instead, we can reason about the content of the given proposed statement and discuss why it aligns with behavioural economics, while also noting limitations of the missing context.

Analysis of the given option (the statement labeled as b):
- This claim asserts that behavioural economics is rooted in the idea that human motivation is driven by psychological, social, and emotional factors. This is consistent with the core intuition of behavioural economics: human decision-making deviates from the purely rational agent model of traditional economics because cognitive biases, emotions, social influences, and contextual factors shape choices. Frameworks like prospect theory, loss aversion, bounded rationality, and social preference models all emphasize these psychological and social dimensions. Therefore, the statement reflects a valid aspect of behavioural economics.
- Strengths of this view include its recognition of non-financial drivers of behavior, such as feelings, heuristics, and social norms, which help explain why people sometimes make seemingly irrational or suboptimal choices in economic settings.

Potential misconceptions and clarifications:
- It would be misleading to claim behavioural economics only accounts for psychological and emotional factors to the exclusion of economic analysis. In reality, it integrates insights from psychology with economic modeling, using rigorous methods to study how actual human behavior deviates from the classic rational-agent assumptions.
- Some descriptions of behavioural economics may overemphasize emotions or biases without considering the role of rational deliberation and strategic thinking in many real-world decisions.
- If there were other options (not shown here), some might incorrectly claim that behavioural economics rejects all traditional economic assumptions or that it only studies irrational behavior. Those would be inaccurate generalizations; the field often seeks to extend and refine classical theory rather than reject it wholesale.

In sum, given the statement provided, it captures a core aspect of behavioural economics—that human behavior is influenced by psychological, social, and emotional factors. However, without the full set of alternative statements to compare, we cannot assess the relative correctness of each option beyond this single assertion.

Note: If additional options were available, a complete evaluation would involve comparing each option to established principles (e.g., whether it acknowledges biases, context effects, social influence, and bounded rationality) and explaining precisely why each alternative is correct or incorrect.

Which statement is correct, in relation to behavioural economics?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following is a feature of behavioural economics?

Which of the following is a feature of behavioural economics?

Which statement is incorrect, with regards to behavioural economics theories?