Jacob is unable to recall any instances of car crashes, but is able to recall a number of plane crashes. Based on this information, Jason concludes that plane crashes are more probable than car crashes. Given that Jacob is making this conclusion on the basis of recalled information, which heuristic is Jacob using to assign probabilities here?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Jacob cannot recall any car crash instances but can recall several plane crash instances, and thus concludes that plane crashes are more probable. He bases this conclusion on what he can recall.
Option 1 - Availability: This is the idea that the ease with which something comes to mind influences judgments about how common or likely it is. Since plane crashes are easily recalled while car crashes are not, Jacob’s probability assessment is biased by the familiarity/availability of the information.
Option 2 - Recognition: This heuristic suggests that if one of two alternatives is recognized and the other is not, the recognized option is judged to be more likely. In this case, Jacob does recognize plane crashes more readily, but the core mechanism described in the scenario is the ease of recall (availability) rather than a binary recognition judgment between two items. The broader pattern could involve recognition, but the question emphasizes recalled information driving probability judgments, which aligns more directly with availability.
Option 3 - Representativeness: This heuristic involves judging probability by how similar something is to a prototypical example or stereotype. There’s no sense in the scenario that Jacob is comparing plane crashes to a typical plane crash or using a stereotype; the error stems from recall bias, not representativeness.
Option 4 - Anchoring: This heuristic is about basing an estimate on an initial value or starting point and adjusting insufficiently away from it. The scenario does not show Jacob starting from an initial probability or value and adjusting; instead, he relies on what he remembers, so anchoring isn’t the best fit here.

Summary of reasoning: The core effect described is that easy recall (availability) biases the perceived frequency or probability of events. While recognition could be involved in a two-item scenario, the question centers on recall-based probability judgments, which points to the availability heuristic as the best match. The other options describe different cognitive shortcuts that do not align as directly with the described memory-based bias.

PSYC20007_2025_SM2 Supplementary or Special Exam: Cognitive Psychology (PSYC20007_2025_SM2)- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A team picks a vendor because the CEO recently read a news article praising that vendor, even though internal data suggests otherwise. Which bias is operating?

Which of the following biases involves overestimating the frequency of memorable events?

When people overestimate the frequency of violent crimes because these events generate a great deal of media coverage, they are using ________________.

Recently experienced local weather conditions often have a greater impact on people's perceived threat of global climate change than less memorable scientific data regarding long-term planetary weather trends. This best illustrates the impact of

People rely on _______ when they judge the frequency or probability of some event by the readiness with which similar events come to mind

Donte purchased a new car, a Ford Mustang, less than a month ago. While sitting in traffic, Donte says to his girlfriend, "Mustangs must be the best-selling car now. I can't remember seeing as many on the road as I have recently." Donte's judgment is most likely biased by a(n)

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单