What is the confidence of the association rule:

{coffee} - {milk, bagel}?

Question

What is the confidence of the association rule:

{coffee} -> {milk, bagel}?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Determine the confidence of the association rule {coffee} -> {milk, bagel} from the given options.

Option 1: 4/4 = 1.0. This would imply that every transaction containing coffee also contains both milk and a bagel. While possible in principle, confidence cannot be assumed to be 1.0 without data showing that all coffee-containing transactions have both milk and a bagel. If the data show any coffee transaction missing either milk or bagel, this option would be incorrect.

Option 2: None of the above. This would be chosen if none of the listed fractions matched the actual confidence computed from the data. Since a numeric value is provided in the answer key (3/4 = 0.75), this option would be incorrect if 3/4 is indeed the correct confidence.

Option 3: 4/3 = 1.33. A confidence value cannot exceed 1.0; probabilities and supports normalize to the range [0, 1]. Therefore 4/3 is mathematically invalid as a confidence measure and should be eliminated on general principles, regardless of data specifics.

Option 4: 3/4 = 0.75. This expresses confidence as the ratio of the support of the combined itemset {coffee, milk, bagel} to the support of the antecedent {coffee}. If 3 of the coffee-containing transactions also contained both milk and a bagel, and there were 4 coffee-containing transactions total, then confidence = 3/4 = 0.75. This matches the standard definition of confidence: P(milk and bagel | coffee) = support(coffee ∪ milk ∪ bagel) / support(coffee).

Option 5: 3/3 = 1.0. This would mean every coffee-containing transaction also contains both milk and a bagel and that there are exactly 3 such transactions. While possible in a tiny dataset, it requires support(coffee) = 3 and support(coffee ∪ milk ∪ bagel) = 3. Without data indicating this exact count, we cannot assume it. Since the provided answer suggests 3/4, this option is unlikely unless the data explicitly show 3 out of 3, which would conflict with 3/4 being the given correct value.

Summary of reasoning across options: Confidence values must lie in [0, 1]. Any value greater than 1 (e.g., 4/3) is invalid for confidence. The value 3/4 = 0.75 is plausible if 3 of 4 coffee transactions also contain both milk and a bagel. Values of 1.0 require that every coffee transaction includes both items, which is only true if the data support that condition. The option None of the above would be valid only if none of the computed confidences matched the actual data-based computation. Based on the provided answer and common interpretation, 3/4 = 0.75 aligns with a typical dataset where 3 out of 4 coffee transactions include both milk and a bagel.

BA 3551 (002 & 003) Quiz 1 - Honorlock

What is the confidence of the association rule: {coffee} -> {milk, bagel}?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

For the given set of transactions sort the association rules listed in order of their decreasing confidence values.

The support of an itemset measures the probability that an itemset appears in a given transaction.

In data mining, linking occurrences to a single event is called:

What is the lift of the association rule: {coffee} -> {milk, bagel}?

What is the support percentage of the association rule {coffee} -> {milk, bagel}?

What is the support count of {bagel, coffee, jam} ?

Consider the following association rule: {jam, butter} -> {bread} Which of the following statements about the association rule is False?

Question at position 13 Which of the following are antecedents of the rule with highest confidence for the consequent whole milk? whole milkrolls/bunsfruit/vegetable juiceyogurtcitrus fruittropical fruitother vegetablesroot vegetables题目解析

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单