题目

PHI 007Y A01 WQ 2025 Week 6 Quiz

多项选择题

P1. Pornography can cause harm. C. We should ban pornography. Which premises can we add (individually) that would make the argument valid:

选项

A.if x should be banned, x causes harm.

B.if x can cause harm, x should be banned.

C.x causing harm is a sufficient condition for banning x

D.If x should be banned, x can cause harm.

E.Everything that can cause harm should be banned.

查看解析

标准答案

Please login to view

思路分析

We are given an initial argument structure: P1. Pornography can cause harm. C. We should ban pornography. The task is to consider which single premises, added individually, would render the argument valid. Now we will evaluate each option in turn. Option A: 'if x should be banned, x causes harm.' If we add this as a premise, the reasoning would be: if pornography should be banned, then pornography causes harm. From P1 (pornography can cause harm) we would have a basis to infer the conclusion (pornography should be banned) only if we also had 'x should be banned' as a premise, which we do not. In short, this premise is about a relationship in the opposite ......Login to view full explanation

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道考试原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

P1. Pornography can cause harm. C. We should ban pornography. Which premises can we add (individually) that would make the argument valid:

P1. Pornography causes women to be objectified. C. Banning pornography will end the objectification of women. Is this argument valid?

Part I – [TOTAL SCORE 10] Determine whether each of the following propositions is True or False. I.4 “A given argument with the false conclusion is invalid only if none of its premises are false.”

The following argument is sound: All cities have terrible public transit. Oakville has terrible public transit. Therefore, Oakville is a city.

更多留学生实用工具

希望你的学习变得更简单

加入我们，立即解锁海量真题与独家解析，让复习快人一步！