In the judicial approach to decision-making, the arbitrator adheres strictly to predetermined criteria and is not influenced by the bargaining power or preference of the parties.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Consider the statement about the judicial approach to decision-making in arbitration.

In this framework, the arbitrator is expected to follow predetermined criteria, such as applicable laws, rules of evidence, and established standards of proof. This means decisions should be grounded in objective criteria rather than the relative bargaining power or subjective preferences of the parties involved.

Arguably, the core idea is neutrality: the arbitrator binds themselves to legal guidelines and the facts presented, rather than being swayed by who has more leverage in the dispute. This helps ensure consistency, predictability, and fairness in outcomes, because similar cases are decided according to the same criteria rather than the dynamics of the negotiation.

One common misunderstanding is to think that any decision-maker in disputes can remain completely uninfluenced by party power. In practice, external pressures, strategic positioning, or expert arguments can subtly shape a decision, but the judicial approach emphasizes insulation from those influences by adhering to predetermined criteria.

Another angle to consider is the distinction between formal adherence to criteria and substantive justice. While the formal process aims to be criterion-driven, there can still be debates about which criteria apply or how to interpret them. The statement, however, asserts the ideal or standard practice: strict adherence to predetermined criteria and non-influence by bargaining power or party preferences.

Therefore, evaluating the claim, the core assertion is that in the judicial approach an arbitrator should operate within fixed criteria and remain independent of party leverage, which aligns with the described concept of neutrality and rule-based decision-making.

If someone disagrees with this stance, they might argue that real-world arbitrators face power dynamics or that discretion within the criteria can lead to biased outcomes. Those points highlight potential limitations rather than a refutation of the intended principle.

37:575:312:E6 & 38:578:515:E6 CONFLCT IN WRK PLACE Assignment (UG): Dispute Resolution Procedures Reading Assignment and Quiz

In the judicial approach to decision-making, the arbitrator adheres strictly to predetermined criteria and is not influenced by the bargaining power or preference of the parties.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Arbitrators do not have the ability to impose a settlement.

Unlike ordinary court rulings, arbitration proceedings and arbitral awards are confidential.

In arbitral proceedings, the applicable procedural law may be chosen by the parties.

The repeat player effect gives employees a considerable advantage over employers in arbitration.

Which dispute resolution method description best defines advisory arbitration?

In arbitral proceedings, the applicable procedural law may be chosen by the parties.

The Arbitrator ruled in favor of the employer (Respondent).

In what year did the Arbitrator issue the arbitration award?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单