Wilderness was recognized as a moral and cultural resource and a basis for national self-esteem by the middle decades of the nineteenth century.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement asserts that wilderness was recognized as a moral and cultural resource and a basis for national self-esteem by the middle decades of the nineteenth century.

To evaluate this, consider the historical context: in the United States, the 1830s–1850s saw a surge of Romantic and nationalist sentiments that framed the natural landscape as a moral teacher and a symbol of national identity. Prominent writers and thinkers argued that wilderness offered spiritual renewal, moral edification, and a distinct American character separate from European models, contributing to a sense of national pride and cultural legitimacy.

Supportive reasoning 1: Proponents argued that the sublime qualities of nature—vast forests, rugged mountains, and expansive frontiers—could cultivate virtue, independence, and practical resilience in citizens, aligning with democratic ideals and the settler project. This perspective often linked wilderness to moral improvement, civic virtue, and the nation’s self-definition.

Supportive reasoning 2: Politically and culturally, wilderness imagery helped craft a national mythology. The frontier narrative reinforced notions of progress, self-reliance, and unique American destiny, which many interpreted as a source of national self-esteem rooted in the land itself.

Counterpoint consideration 1: Some critiques within the period highlighted tensions between romantic wilderness ideals and the realities of colonization, displacement of Indigenous peoples, and environmental exploitation. These critiques complicate a blanket claim that wilderness was universally celebrated as a moral resource across all segments of society.

Counterpoint consideration 2: The degree to which wilderness functioned as a moral resource versus a resource for national prestige varied by region, audience, and intellectual tradition. While many celebrated wilderness as morally edifying, others emphasized economic utilitarian viewpoints or debated the moral implications of frontier expansion.

In summary, the claim centers on a broad cultural trend in which wilderness was invoked as both a moral tutor and a cornerstone of a distinctive national identity in the mid-19th century, though its reception was not monolithic and included significant critical perspectives.

If you were to compare interpretations, you would weigh literary, religious, and political writings of the era, looking for language that ties natural landscapes to character formation, national purpose, and legitimacy of the American project, while also noting critiques that challenge or refine that framing.

rst_242_120251_247677 2.3 | Week 2 Quiz

Wilderness was recognized as a moral and cultural resource and a basis for national self-esteem by the middle decades of the nineteenth century.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单