Which of the following alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes is usually the first approach taken when trying to resolve a dispute?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To understand which ADR process is usually the first approach, let's restate the question and options: Question: Which ADR process is usually the first approach taken when trying to resolve a dispute? Options: 1) mediation 2) negotiation 3) binding arbitration 4) voluntary arbitration

Option 1: mediation. Mediation involves a neutral third party who helps the disputing sides communicate and work toward a settlement, but the key element is that the mediator facilitates rather than directly negotiates on behalf of either side. While common, mediation is not necessarily the very first step in all contexts, since parties might attempt direct discussions before or instead of engaging a mediator. This makes it a plausible but not universally the first approach.

Option 2: negotiation. Negotiation is the direct, informal process where the parties themselves discuss terms to reach a settlement without third-party involvement. It is typically the first line of resolution because it requires no third party, is cost-effective, and can occur spontaneously before any formal ADR step is invoked. This aligns with common practice in many disputes where parties initially attempt to resolve issues through direct talks.

Option 3: binding arbitration. In binding arbitration, a neutral arbitrator makes a decision that is typically final and enforceable, similar to a court judgment. This is a more formal, secondary step that parties usually pursue after attempting direct negotiation or mediation, rather than the initial approach.

Option 4: voluntary arbitration. Voluntary arbitration refers to choosing arbitration as a resolution method, often after some informal attempts or when the parties want a quicker or private procedure than court. Like binding arbitration, this is generally not the first step; it is a selected ADR path that occurs after some preliminary efforts or explicit agreement to arbitrate.

Synthesis: Although mediation can occur early and is common in many dispute settings, the hallmark of the earliest, most direct attempt at resolution is negotiation, because it involves the parties communicating directly without third-party facilitation. The other options describe processes that either involve third parties (mediation) or are more formal and typically pursued after initial informal efforts (arbitration paths).

In summary, option 2 (negotiation) best fits the description of the usual first approach to resolving a dispute, with the other options representing alternative or later-stage ADR steps.

Introduction to Personal Finance CP - 2 - Beatty - Preparatory Academy - 1st Semester - 2025/2026 Unit 3: Exam- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Which of the following alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes is usually the first approach taken when trying to resolve a dispute?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

One alternative to product liability lawsuits is called

Question at position 14 Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes in which a third party assists the parties in a negotiation by focusing on the process without offering advice or opinions.TrueFalse

Conciliation and mediation are two words for the same thing.

Which from the following is NOT the bodies of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?

If claimants do not want to go to courts in order to get settlement of a civil case, what will be the method that they may applied?

Which from the following is NOT the bodies of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?

If claimants do not want to go to courts in order to get settlement of a civil case, what will be the method that they may apply?

When it comes to ADR, rights-based disputes are best resolved through the use of mediation.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单