True or False: Enroute controllers must provide merging target procedures to all radar identified:
1. Aircraft at 10,000 feet and above.
2. Turbojet aircraft regardless of altitude.
3. Presidential aircraft regardless of altitude.

Question

True or False: Enroute controllers must provide merging target procedures to all radar identified: 
1. Aircraft at 10,000 feet and above. 
2. Turbojet aircraft regardless of altitude. 
3. Presidential aircraft regardless of altitude.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks to evaluate a true/false statement about enroute controllers and merging target procedures, followed by three specific aircraft categories.
Option 1 (the statement as a whole): 'Enroute controllers must provide merging target procedures to all radar identified: 1. Aircraft at 10,000 feet and above. 2. Turbojet aircraft regardless of altitude. 3. Presidential aircraft regardless of altitude.' The core idea is that merging targets are provided to radar-identified aircraft to maintain safe separation and efficient sequencing on the airway system. The rule commonly taught is that enroute controllers must establish merging target procedures for high-priority or performance-sensitive categories to ensure orderly flow and prevent collisions, especially where speed, altitude, and priority differ.
Option 2 (about 10,000 feet and above): If this were true, it would mean all radar-identified aircraft at or above 10,000 ft must receive merging targets. In practice, sector-specific procedures emphasize tracking and sequencing for high-altitude traffic, but the blanket requirement may depend on the airspace, facility procedures, and appropriate separation minima. The reasoning for including 10,000 ft+ is that higher altitude traffic often operates at speeds where standard merging logic is critical to prevent conflicts, though some lower-altitude traffic can also require merging targets in dense airspace.
Option 3 (about turbojet aircraft regardless of altitude): Turbojet aircraft typically have higher speeds, requiring more careful coordination and potentially merging targets. The implication that they always require merging targets at any altitude aligns with prioritizing fast-moving traffic to maintain safe separation, especially because speed differentials can create merging conflicts even at lower altitudes. However, some non-turbojet aircraft (e.g., turboprops) at certain altitudes may also need merging targets; thus, the universal "regardless of altitude" phrasing may be more classroom-oriented than practice-specific, depending on facilities and traffic mix.
Option 4 (about presidential aircraft regardless of altitude): Presidential or other security-sensitive flights often have stringent tracking and sequencing requirements, with special handling to ensure consistent separation, predictability, and security. This justification supports providing merging targets for such aircraft regardless of altitude, reflecting their priority status and the need for explicit coordination.
Option 5 (why the statement is true overall): If the standard practice in the given material is that enroute controllers must provide merging targets to all radar-identified aircraft in the listed priority categories (high altitude, fast jets, and distinguished flights), then the compiled statement is true because it integrates these categories under one rule. The combined phrasing is consistent with a curriculum that emphasizes robust target-merging coverage for aircraft that pose higher separation challenges or require enhanced sequencing due to speed, altitude, or security priority.
Option 6 (why the statement could be questioned): If there are context-dependent exceptions—such as specific airspace, radar coverage limitations, or procedural variance between regions—the blanket claim could be too broad. The presence of exceptions would render the overall statement not universally applicable, depending on the material you are studying.
Option 7 (false reasoning to watch out for): A common misconception would be to think that merging targets are only for high-altitude commercial traffic, ignoring that speed and priority criteria often extend to turbojets and security aircraft. Another pitfall is assuming that all radar-identified aircraft automatically receive merging targets regardless of their operational priority, which would conflict with tiered controller procedures and workload management.
In summary, evaluating the options shows that the statement aligns with a prioritized merging-target framework, recognizing special handling for high-priority or high-performance categories, while also acknowledging that real-world procedures can include context-dependent nuances and exceptions.

AT 405 Module 18 Pop

True or False: Enroute controllers must provide merging target procedures to all radar identified: 1. Aircraft at 10,000 feet and above. 2. Turbojet aircraft regardless of altitude. 3. Presidential aircraft regardless of altitude.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单