Which show from the eText discussed a lawsuit challenging affirmative action?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks: 'Which show from the eText discussed a lawsuit challenging affirmative action?'.

First, I note that the provided data includes an answer field and an answer_options field, but the answer_options array is empty. Without any listed options to evaluate, I cannot perform per-option analysis or contrast why one option is correct versus others. In a typical setup, I would restate the full question and then examine each option one by one, explaining why the option is or isn't correct.

Additionally, the data provides a single answer text: "The Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj". If I were to analyze this in isolation, I would consider what the show typically covers. The Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj is primarily known for exploring current events, politics, and social issues, often with a focus on policies and governance. To determine whether this specific show discussed a lawsuit challenging affirmative action, I would look for a segment in that program that explicitly covers affirmative action litigation, join points about the case, the parties involved, and the legal basis for the challenge. However, since no options are given, I cannot map this answer text to a multiple-choice option or distinguish it from other possible options.

In a normal scenario, here is how I would evaluate options if they were present:
- Option A: If the option claims the show discussed an affirmative action lawsuit, I would check the episode's content to verify whether it indeed covers a lawsuit, the parties involved, and the legal questions at issue. If it does, I would explain why this option is correct and cite the aspects of the segment that support it.
- Option B: If the option asserts a different show or a non-affirmative-action topic, I would explain why it fails to match the question, noting mismatches such as coverage of other topics, absence of a lawsuit discussion, or wrong program.
- Option C: If the option contains a nuanced claim (e.g., discussed but not in detail, or touched on but not about a specific lawsuit), I would clarify the degree of relevance and explain why partial relevance does or does not satisfy the question.

Since the required options are absent, I cannot provide a line-by-line justification for each option or point out specific misconceptions for non-existent choices. If you can provide the complete set of answer options, I can rewrite the analysis with detailed, varied reasoning for each option, clearly identifying why the correct choice fits and why the others do not.

macs_100_120251_246448 MACS 100 Popular Television and Movies Final Exam

Which show from the eText discussed a lawsuit challenging affirmative action?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In its 2014 Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action decision, the Supreme Court ruled that

As discussed in class, traditionally affirmative action, if done following the appropriate steps, can be legal, as demonstrated by which of the following league and their rule encouraging interviewing minority candidates?

The Rooney Rule is a NFL policy that requires league teams to interview ethnic-minority candidates for head coaching and senior football operation jobs. This is an example of legal racial discrimination commonly referred to as: _______________

In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that

In a 2003 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the University of Michigan __________.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单