When one company buys a controlling interest in another company on April 1 (assuming a calendar year). How should the pre-acquisition subsidiary revenues and expenses be disclosed in the consolidated balances for the year of acquisition?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks how pre-acquisition subsidiary revenues and expenses should be disclosed in the consolidated balances for the year of acquisition when one company buys a controlling interest in another on April 1.
Because the answer options are not provided in full, I will focus on the core accounting principle and how a typical correct option would be reasoned.
First, consider the standard treatment for a business combination under consolidation accounting: pre-acquisition revenues and expenses of the subsidiary are not included in the consolidated income statement for the period in which the acquisition occurs. The consolidated results after the acquisition reflect the subsidiary’s post-acquisition performance as a part of the combined entity from the acquisition date forward. This ensures that the income statement portrays only the results attributable to the period after control was obtained, consistent with the notion that controls, and thus consolidation, begin on the acquisition date.
Second, many accounting frameworks require or provide for supplemental pro forma information. This pro forma presentation shows what the combined entity’s revenue and earnings would have looked like if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the reporting period. Although this is for supplementary disclosure and not part of the actual consolidated financial statements, it helps users assess the potential impact of the acquisition on the entity’s ongoing performance.
With that in mind, the typical correct concept captured by an option like the one described would state two things: (1) only post-acquisition revenues and expenses are included in the consolidated totals for the financial statements, and (2) supplemental pro forma information presents the combined entity’s revenue and earnings as if the acquisition date were the beginning of the reporting period for all business combinations during the year. This aligns with common practice in many accounting frameworks, where retrospective consolidation is avoided in the actual statements but pro forma figures are provided for comparative purposes.
Now, evaluating the reasoning for the specific wording given in the described option (the one labeled D):
- The statement that only post-acquisition revenues and expenses are included in the consolidated totals matches the fundamental principle that control starts on the acquisition date, so pre-acquisition results are not consolidated in the period of acquisition.
- The addition that supplemental pro forma information includes the combined entity’s revenue and earnings for the current period as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the annual reporting period correctly describes a common supplementary disclosure, meant to aid analysis and comparability across periods.
- The emphasis on “for all business combinations that occurred during the year” being shown as beginning-of-year figures in pro forma information correctly reflects the standard practice of presenting a uniform pro forma baseline for multiple acquisitions within the same reporting period.
Regarding why other, non-provided options (which might include claims like blending pre- and post-acquisition results in the actual consolidated totals, or presenting pre-acquisition results as part of the current period’s earnings) are incorrect: integrating pre-acquisition activity into the consolidated statements would improperly attribute former ownership periods to the consolidated entity and distort period performance. Limiting the disclosure to actual results without any pro forma supplementary data would reduce usefulness for readers evaluating the impact of the acquisitions. Conversely, presenting pro forma information that excludes the acquisition date impact or misstates the baseline would mislead users about comparability and timing.
In sum, the correct concept would separate actual consolidated results (post-acquisition only) from supplementary pro forma information (retrospective, beginning-of-period basis for the combined entity), which provides a clearer view of how the acquisition affects ongoing performance while preserving the integrity of the period’s reported results.

When one company buys a controlling interest in another company on April 1 (assuming a calendar year). How should the pre-acquisition subsidiary revenues and expenses be disclosed in the consolidated balances for the year of acquisition?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单