The key players in standard setting in Australia are the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB). Other key players in financial reporting regulation include the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), and the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).[Fill in the blank]
Compare briefly between the roles of the FRC and the AASB.[Fill in the blank]
Discuss briefly the relationship between FRC and the AASB in Australia.[Fill in the blank]

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents three fill-in-the-blank prompts and provides two candidate responses in the answer list. The task is to compare roles of the FRC and AASB and describe their relationship.

Option 1: The FRC is responsible for providing broad oversight and strategic direction for accounting and auditing standard setting in Australia, including appointing members and setting priorities. The AASB, on the other hand, is tasked with the development, formulation, and issuing of Australian Accounting Standards in accordance with the guidelines set by the FRC.
- This option correctly captures the descriptive distinction where the FRC acts as the governance body that sets priorities and oversees the standard-setting landscape, while the AASB is the technical body that actually creates and issues standards.
- The emphasis on the FRC appointing members and setting priorities aligns with the typical governance role of a standards oversight council, and the AASB’s mandate to develop and issue standards follows those directions. 
- A potential misconception to watch for is treating the FRC as a standard setter itself; in this framing, the FRC guides policy and oversight, whereas the AASB performs the technical standard-setting work.

Option 2: The FRC oversees and monitors the work of the AASB, providing the strategic framework within which the AASB operates. The AASB is accountable to the FRC, ensuring that its standards-setting activities align with the policy directions and priorities established by the FRC.
- This option conveys the governance relationship clearly: the FRC provides strategic framework and oversight, and the AASB operates within that framework.
- The notion that the AASB is accountable to the FRC captures the supervisory dynamic typical of such arrangements, ensuring alignment with policy directions and priorities.
- A common pitfall would be to imply that the FRC directly sets or issues standards; instead, this option appropriately places the FRC in an oversight and strategic role relative to the AASB’s technical work.

In summary, both statements describe complementary aspects of the governance and relationship between the FRC and the AASB: the FRC provides broad oversight, strategic direction, and accountability, while the AASB conducts the actual standards development under that framework, with accountability to the FRC. The first option emphasizes the functional distinction between oversight and technical development, and the second option emphasizes the governance relationship and alignment with policy directions. The explanations highlight typical misconceptions and clarify the division of labor between these two key Australian standard-setting bodies.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Once listed, Hinge Health can voluntarily decide to provide financial statements according to any accounting standard framework as long as it discloses which set of accounting standards it uses.

Once listed, Hinge Health can voluntarily decide to provide financial statements according to any accounting standard framework as long as it discloses which set of accounting standards it uses.

What does IFRS stand for?

Australian accounting standards are principle-based accounting standards. This means they are:

The FASB issues accounting standards in the form of:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单